Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

NRNP 6665-01, Week 11 Final Exam Solutions 2026/2027 Advanced PMHNP Care Across the Lifespan | Complex & Evolving Case Studies| Actual Questions & Verified Solutions | Advanced Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner | Pass Guarantee

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
53
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
25-01-2026
Geschreven in
2025/2026

NRNP 6665-01, Week 11 Final Exam Solutions 2026/2027 Advanced PMHNP Care Across the Lifespan | Complex & Evolving Case Studies| Actual Questions & Verified Solutions | Advanced Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner | Pass Guarantee

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
NRNP 6665-01,
Vak
NRNP 6665-01,

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

NRNP 6665-01, Week 11 Final Exam Solutions 2026/2027 Advanced
PMHNP Care Across the Lifespan | Complex & Evolving Case Studies|
Actual Questions & Verified Solutions | Advanced Psychiatric-Mental
Health Nurse Practitioner | Pass Guarantee




CASE BLOCK 1: Pediatric Neurodevelopmental Complexity

Patient Profile: "Marcus Chen"

Age: 9 years, 3 months | Sex: Male | Presenting: Initial psychiatric evaluation

Referral Source: Pediatrician & school psychologist collaborative referral

Chief Concerns: Declining academic performance, emotional dysregulation, peer
rejection, "outbursts that seem disproportionate"

Background: Marcus is a third-grader previously identified as "gifted" in mathematics.
Over the past 18 months, teachers report increasing difficulty with transitions, repetitive
questioning, emotional meltdowns when routines change, and social isolation. Parents
describe intense interests in dinosaur taxonomy (knows 150+ species with Latin
names) but cannot engage in reciprocal play. Marcus becomes "hysterical" if his
morning routine is altered. He has started refusing school on days with field trips or
assemblies. Parents separated 8 months ago; Marcus lives primarily with mother, visits
father every other weekend.

,Developmental History: Motor milestones met on time. Language precocious—full
sentences by 18 months. No regression. History of sensory sensitivities (clothing tags,
food textures) since toddlerhood.

Medical: Generally healthy. No current medications. Allergies: penicillin.

Family Psychiatric History: Maternal uncle with bipolar I disorder; paternal grandfather
"eccentric, never diagnosed"; mother with generalized anxiety disorder.

Initial Observations: Marcus enters room with mother, avoids eye contact, immediately
identifies the diplodocus model on the shelf ("That should have 15 cervical vertebrae,
not 12"), becomes distressed when the session timer is visible ("I need to know exactly
when this ends").



Question 1

Marcus's presentation most strongly suggests which primary diagnostic formulation
requiring further evaluation?

A. Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder (DMDD) with comorbid Specific Learning
Disorder

B. Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Level 2, with consideration of comorbid Anxiety
Disorder

C. Early-onset Bipolar Disorder, mixed features, precipitated by parental separation

D. ADHD, Combined Presentation, with comorbid Oppositional Defiant Disorder

Correct Answer: B

,Rationale: Marcus presents with a classic constellation of ASD features:
restricted/repetitive interests (dinosaur taxonomy with exceptional detail), insistence on
sameness/routines (morning routine intolerance, need for precise session timing),
sensory sensitivities (clothing, food), social-communication challenges (lack of
reciprocal play, peer rejection), and atypical affective presentation (emotional
dysregulation linked to environmental changes rather than mood cycling).

The "hysterical" responses to routine changes represent meltdowns characteristic of
ASD, not mood episodes. His mathematical giftedness with social impairment suggests
the "twice-exceptional" profile common in ASD.

Why A is incorrect: While emotional dysregulation is present, the irritability is
context-specific (transitions, sensory issues) rather than the pervasive, severe irritability
of DMDD. The restricted interests and social deficits are not explained by DMDD.

Why C is incorrect: No evidence of episodic mood elevation, decreased need for sleep,
grandiosity, or goal-directed activity. The "outbursts" are reactive to environmental
stimuli, not spontaneous mood episodes. Family history alone doesn't justify this
diagnosis.

Why D is incorrect: While some ADHD features may co-occur, the core
social-communication deficits, restricted interests, and sensory issues are not
explained by ADHD. The emotional dysregulation is not oppositional but rather
distress-based.



Question 2

Given the diagnostic hypothesis, which assessment battery would provide the most
comprehensive, evidence-based evaluation?

, A. Conners-3, CBCL, and continuous performance testing only

B. ADOS-2, ADI-R, cognitive assessment (WISC-V), and sensory processing evaluation

C. K-SADS-PL, YMRS, and CDRS-R to rule out mood disorders first

D. Projective testing (Rorschach, TAT) and personality inventory (MMPI-A)

Correct Answer: B

Rationale: The gold standard ASD assessment requires structured observation
(ADOS-2) and developmental history (ADI-R). Cognitive assessment (WISC-V) is
essential to evaluate the "twice-exceptional" profile and identify any scatter between
verbal and nonverbal abilities. Sensory processing evaluation addresses the
documented sensory sensitivities that significantly impact functioning. This battery
follows DSM-5-TR and NICE guidelines for ASD assessment.

Why A is incorrect: Conners-3 and CPT assess ADHD, not ASD. While CBCL provides
broad behavioral data, they miss core ASD domains. This battery would inadequately
evaluate the primary diagnostic hypothesis.

Why C is incorrect: While mood disorders should be considered, K-SADS-PL and mood
rating scales are premature without first establishing whether symptoms are better
explained by ASD. The presentation doesn't suggest primary mood disorder.

Why D is incorrect: Projective testing lacks reliability and validity for ASD diagnosis.
MMPI-A is inappropriate for a 9-year-old and doesn't assess ASD features. This
approach is not evidence-based.



Question 3

Geschreven voor

Instelling
NRNP 6665-01,
Vak
NRNP 6665-01,

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
25 januari 2026
Aantal pagina's
53
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

€13,24
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
TutorRicks Chamberlain College Of Nursing
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
291
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
50
Documenten
2767
Laatst verkocht
1 dag geleden

3,8

39 beoordelingen

5
20
4
4
3
8
2
1
1
6

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen