-ANSWER----S) EXAM 2025/26!!
Question 1: Ethical Conflict & Jurisdiction
A CFT monitor discovers that an attorney subject to monitoring in State A is also
under investigation in State B for related misconduct. The attorney provides
documentation to the monitor that is potentially exculpatory for the State B
matter but contains privileged client information not covered by the monitoring
agreement's release. The monitor's primary ethical obligation is to:
A) Immediately forward all documentation to the authority in State B, as it
pertains to attorney misconduct.
B) Securely retain the documentation and inform the monitoring authority in
State A, seeking instruction on whether the scope of the agreement or release
needs amendment.
C) Advise the attorney to turn the documents over directly to State B authorities
to avoid any involvement.
D) Review the documents and redact privileged information before providing
them to State A, as the monitoring agreement mandates cooperation.
----answer---- Rationale & Rotation:
• Correct ----answer---- (Position varies): B. The monitor's duty is bounded
by the specific agreement with the licensing authority (State A). Venturing
beyond that scope without explicit authorization or a proper legal mandate
(like a subpoena) violates confidentiality and the agreed-upon role. The
proper step is to escalate to the contracting authority.
• A is incorrect because it violates privilege and exceeds the monitor's
authority.
, • C is incorrect as it constitutes legal advice outside the monitor's role.
• D is incorrect because the monitor likely lacks the legal authority to
unilaterally determine what is privileged in another jurisdiction's case.
Question 2: Complex Financial Analysis
During a review of client trust accounts, a monitor notes several "round-dollar"
transfers from an IOLTA account to the attorney's operating account, each labeled
"Fee Payment." The attorney provides fee agreements that are contingent in
nature. The red flag that warrants deepest investigation is:
A) The transfers occurred monthly.
B) The fee agreements are contingent, meaning no fee is earned until case
conclusion, making immediate transfers questionable.
C) The amounts are round numbers.
D) The transfers were from IOLTA to operating, which is a normal process for
earned fees.
----answer---- Rationale & Rotation:
• Correct ----answer----: B. This is the core substantive issue. Under
contingent fee models, particularly per rules like ABA Model Rule 1.5, fees
are typically collected at settlement. Regular
transfers during representation suggest possible improper advancement of
fees or commingling, a serious violation.
• A & C are suspicious but less conclusive alone (some flat fees could be
structured monthly).
• D is true for earned fees, but the key is whether they were actually earned
per the agreement terms.
Question 3: Regulatory Application
An attorney on monitoring is permitted to practice in a limited capacity, excluding
the handling of client funds. The monitor learns the attorney is serving as a court-
appointed guardian ad litem for a minor. The court's order provides for a fee to
be paid from the minor's estate into a blocked account, requiring a court order for
disbursement. The monitor should:
A) Take no action, as the funds are controlled by the court and not the attorney's
client trust account.