LJU4802 Assignment 1 (WRITTEN) Semester 1 2026 - Due 23 March 2026

Professional Ethics - LJU4802 Assignment 1 Semester 1 2026 - Due 23 March 2026; 100 % TRUSTED workings, Expert Solved, Explanations and Solutions. For assistance call or W.h.a.t.s.a.p.p us on ...(.+.2.5.4.7.7.9.5.4.0.1.3.2)........... ASSIGNMENT 01 DUE DATE AND TIME: 23 MARCH 2026 AT 1:00 PM Written assignment You must submit your assignment electronically via myUnisa on or before 23 March 2026 at 1:00 pm. Please note that the assignment may not be submitted by fax or e mail. Read Legal Practice Council v Jo Francois Spies, Case No: 55628/20 and answer the questions here below. • Where to find the case: The case is provided with the assignment questions, but it can also be accessed under “Additional Resources” on the myUnisa LJU4802 module site. • NOTE: You will find the answers to the questions in the case AND in the Learning Units of the study material. You should therefore ONLY use the case and the Learning Units to complete Assignment 01. INSTRUCTIONS: • You must provide references in the form of footnotes. For example, you must provide a citation with the paragraph in the case, or the specific heading in the Learning Unit under which you found the answer. You must also provide a bibliography at the end of your assignment. You must follow the prescribed modes of citation in Tutorial Letter 302 that is available under "Additional Resources" on the myUnisa LJU4802 module site. Two marks will be awarded for the footnotes and the bibliography. • You must clearly indicate your name and student number on your assignment. You must submit the completed assignment through Turn-It-In. Please note: You must accept the End-User License Agreement (EULA). If you do not accept the EULA, you will forfeit your mark for the assignment. You must submit your assignment in typed format. Since the Turn-It-In system cannot process handwritten assignments, they will not be marked. Because of the use of Turn-It-In, NO LATE SUBMISSIONS CAN BE ACCEPTED. 2 LJU4802/2/2025 • You must number your typed answers clearly. Questions are set and marked in numerical order, and you are expected to answer the questions in the order that they are asked. Question 1 1.1 Name the applicant in the Spies-case. (1) 1.2 With reference to applicable legislation, describe the purpose of the applicant identified in 1.1. (3) Question 2 Explain why an attorney must have a Fidelity Fund certificate and practise with a trust banking account. (3) Question 3 3.1 With specific reference to Jasat v Natal Law Society 2000 (3) SA 44 (SCA), describe the three-stage enquiry that a court applies to determine whether a person is fit and proper to practise as an attorney. (4) 3.2 Name the three factors that a court’s decision on the third leg of the enquiry (as you set out in 3.1) will depend on. (3) 3.3 What was the sanction that the court imposed in the Spies-case? Question 4 Consider the following statement: (1) If a legal practitioner who was struck off the role apply for readmission, he/she will be required to satisfy the court that he/she is “a completely reformed character” and that his “reformation or rehabilitation is, in all the known circumstances, of a permanent nature”. With specific reference to Lize Maartens v The South African Legal Practice Council (Case 19239/2022), set out the factors that the court will take into consideration to determine whether the practitioner may be readmitted. (3) Total: 18 + 2 = [20]