Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

HRPYC81 Project 5 Assignment 4 (RESEARCH REPORT) 2026 - DUE 13 October 2026 - The Psychology of Conspiracy Beliefs

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
26
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
27-04-2026
Geschreven in
2025/2026

HRPYC81 Project 5 Assignment 4 (RESEARCH REPORT) 2026 - DUE 13 October 2026 - The Psychology of Conspiracy Beliefs ; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. For assistance, Whats-App 0.8.1..2.7.8..3.3.7.2... Ensure your success with us... Research Project The Psychology of Conspiracy Beliefs Research Area General Psychology Number of Students Limited to 400 students Project Description Imagine the following situation. After waiting several hours at a local clinic, Zanele noticed that some patients had been called in before her. When others in the queue suggested that clinic staff were secretly prioritising certain people for hidden reasons, she began to believe the system was deliberately unfair. Feeling anxious and lacking control, Zanele stopped trusting official explanations about delays and interpreted routine inefficiency as evidence of a hidden plan. Zanele assumes a conspiracy. Some conspiracy theories can be benign and thus, rather entertaining than harmful. However, other conspiracy theories have the potential to be harmful to individuals and/or societies, such as the claim that HIV does not cause AIDS, and that antiretroviral treatments are harmful, promoted by the former president Thabo Mbeki from 1999 to 2008. It is essential to note that conspiracy theories are not only omnipresent among members of both modern and traditional societies, but also that the term conspiracy has been used to invalidate legitimate accusations (e.g., corruption). It is also important to note that conspiracies actually exist, as the State Capture Conspiracy that “A small group of business elites secretly controls government decisions” was eventually confirmed by the Zondo Commission. Conspiracy theory beliefs, which emerge from interactions of cognitive, motivational, personality, and socio-cultural processes, refer to “theories” about how people, objects or events are causally interconnected (pattern), stipulate that the plans of alleged conspirators are deliberate (agency), involve a coalition, or group, of actors working in conjunction, contain an element of threat such that the alleged goals of the conspirators are harmful or deceptive, and carry an element of secrecy and is therefore often difficult to invalidate (van Prooijen & van Vugt, 2018). Grounded in various psychological theoretical foundations (e.g., motivational, cognitive and reasoning styles) and related to concepts such as conspiracy mentality and cognitive biases, they are often described as comprising different interrelated components and psychological functions. Recent research suggests that conspiracy theory beliefs are related to various factors, including personality (dark triad) traits such as Narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and conspiracy mentality, emotional factors such as anxiety, cognitive factors such as (illusory) 2 pattern perceptions, Bullshit receptivity, supernatural beliefs, trust, mattering, mental well-being, life satisfaction, prosocial behaviour, prejudice and corruption, among. In addition, sociodemographic variables such as age, gender, relationship status, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status will be included as potential control variables.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

HRPYC81
PROJECT 5: The Psychology of Conspiracy Beliefs
Assignment 4 RESEARCH REPORT 2026
Due Date: 2026
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANXIETY, TRUST AND CONSPIRACY THEORY
BELIEFS AMONG ADULTS IN SOUTH AFRICA

ABSTRACT

The present study examined the relationship between anxiety, trust, and conspiracy theory
beliefs among adults in South Africa. Conspiracy theory beliefs have been associated with
uncertainty, institutional distrust, and psychological distress, making them particularly
relevant in socio-political contexts characterised by inequality and governance challenges
(Douglas et al., 2019). The study aimed to test whether higher levels of anxiety and lower
levels of trust are associated with stronger endorsement of conspiracy theory beliefs. A
quantitative cross-sectional survey design was employed, using data collected through an
online questionnaire administered via Qualtrics. The sample consisted of adult participants
aged 18 years and older, with data pooled across multiple student researchers to increase
sample size and variability. Conspiracy theory beliefs were measured using the Composite
Conspiracy Belief Scale (Talò, 2025), anxiety was assessed using the Depression Anxiety
Stress Scales (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995), and trust was measured using the General
Trust Scale (Yamagishi & Yamagishi, 1994). Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
 Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Terms of use
 Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
 Use this document
Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, reference,or and
misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
 Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
 Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.

Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.

, +27 81 278 3372



THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANXIETY, TRUST AND CONSPIRACY THEORY
BELIEFS AMONG ADULTS IN SOUTH AFRICA

ABSTRACT

The present study examined the relationship between anxiety, trust, and conspiracy
theory beliefs among adults in South Africa. Conspiracy theory beliefs have been
associated with uncertainty, institutional distrust, and psychological distress, making
them particularly relevant in socio-political contexts characterised by inequality and
governance challenges (Douglas et al., 2019). The study aimed to test whether
higher levels of anxiety and lower levels of trust are associated with stronger
endorsement of conspiracy theory beliefs. A quantitative cross-sectional survey
design was employed, using data collected through an online questionnaire
administered via Qualtrics. The sample consisted of adult participants aged 18 years
and older, with data pooled across multiple student researchers to increase sample
size and variability. Conspiracy theory beliefs were measured using the Composite
Conspiracy Belief Scale (Talò, 2025), anxiety was assessed using the Depression
Anxiety Stress Scales (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995), and trust was measured using
the General Trust Scale (Yamagishi & Yamagishi, 1994).

The results indicated a statistically significant positive relationship between anxiety
and conspiracy theory beliefs, suggesting that individuals with higher anxiety levels
were more likely to endorse conspiratorial explanations. In addition, a statistically
significant negative relationship was found between trust and conspiracy theory
beliefs, indicating that lower levels of trust were associated with stronger conspiracy
belief endorsement. These findings support the proposed hypotheses and highlight
the role of emotional and social factors in shaping conspiracy thinking. The study
contributes to the understanding of conspiracy theory beliefs within the South African
context by demonstrating how anxiety and trust interact to influence belief formation.
The findings have implications for interventions aimed at improving public trust and
addressing psychological vulnerability to misinformation.

.



Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is"
without any express or implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or
liability for any actions taken based on the information contained within this document. This document is
intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes. Reproduction, resale, or transmission
of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.

, +27 81 278 3372



1. INTRODUCTION

Conspiracy theory beliefs have become increasingly prominent in contemporary
societies, particularly in contexts marked by uncertainty, inequality, and declining
institutional trust. These beliefs refer to explanations of events that attribute causality
to secret, coordinated actions by powerful groups acting with harmful intent (van
Prooijen & Douglas, 2018). In South Africa, persistent socio-economic inequality,
corruption, and service delivery challenges have created conditions in which
individuals may question official explanations and become more susceptible to
conspiratorial thinking (Cordonier & Cafiero, 2024). Understanding the psychological
factors associated with conspiracy beliefs is therefore critical, as such beliefs can
undermine public health initiatives, reduce institutional trust, and contribute to social
division (Douglas et al., 2019).

Emotional and social factors play a central role in the development of conspiracy
theory beliefs. Anxiety has been identified as a key emotional driver, as individuals
experiencing uncertainty and distress are more likely to seek explanations that
provide structure and predictability (Krüppel et al., 2023). Conspiracy beliefs offer
simplified causal narratives that can temporarily reduce psychological discomfort. At
the same time, trust represents an important social factor that shapes how
individuals evaluate information. Low levels of trust in institutions and authorities
increase the likelihood of rejecting official accounts and endorsing alternative
explanations (Jennings et al., 2021).

The present study examines the relationship between anxiety, trust, and conspiracy
theory beliefs within the South African context. Specifically, the study investigates
whether higher levels of anxiety and lower levels of trust are associated with stronger
endorsement of conspiracy beliefs. These constructs were examined using a
quantitative cross-sectional survey design, allowing for the statistical analysis of
relationships between variables. By focusing on these factors, the study aims to
contribute to a deeper understanding of the psychological processes underlying
conspiracy theory beliefs and to inform strategies aimed at addressing their negative
societal consequences.

2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is"
without any express or implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or
liability for any actions taken based on the information contained within this document. This document is
intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes. Reproduction, resale, or transmission
of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.

Gekoppeld boek

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
27 april 2026
Aantal pagina's
26
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

€4,08
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
EduPal University of South Africa (Unisa)
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
152486
Lid sinds
7 jaar
Aantal volgers
36024
Documenten
4880
Laatst verkocht
2 uur geleden

At EduPal we provide academic assistance, exam preparation, detailed notes, and exam packs to help college students study with confidence. Our tutoring is comprehensive and personalised, focusing on your subject needs and deadlines. We guarantee quality support, clear guidance, and proven strategies that improve understanding, marks, and pass rates. For more information Whats-App 0.8.1..2.7.8..3.3.7.2..

4,2

14139 beoordelingen

5
8211
4
2766
3
1847
2
478
1
837

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen