Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

WGU C202; Managing Human Capital Test Questions with 100% Correct Answers

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
21
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
23-05-2026
Geschreven in
2025/2026

WGU C202; Managing Human Capital Test Questions with 100% Correct Answers

Instelling
WGU C202
Vak
WGU C202

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

WGU C202; Managing Human Capital
Test Questions with 100% Correct
Answers

Investiture Socialization - Answer-Builds newcomers' self-confidence and reflects senior
employees' valuing of newcomer's knowledge and personal characteristics.

Formal Socialization - Answer-Structured socialization using specifically designed
activities and materials away from the work setting.

Reinforcers - Answer-Anything that makes a behavior more likely to happen again.

Closed Skills - Answer-Skills performed similarly or exactly like they are taught in
training.

Aptitude-treatment Interaction - Answer-The concept that some training strategies are
more or less effective depending on a learner's particular abilities, personality traits, and
other characteristics.

Divestiture Socialization - Answer-Tries to deny and strip away certain personal
characteristics.

Learning Style - Answer-How people differ in how we process information when
problem solving or learning.

Horns Effect - Answer-Letting one negative factor influence assessments of other areas
of behavior or performance.

Paired Comparison Method - Answer-Every employee in a work group is compared to
the other members.

Checklist Method - Answer-The assessor uses a checklist of prescaled descriptions of
behavior to evaluate the employee.

Forced Distribution Method - Answer-The rater distributes performance ratings into a
pre-specific performance distribution.

Multi-source Assessments - Answer-Performance feedback from the employees's
supervisor as well as other sources who are familiar with an employee's job
performance.

,Performance Improvement Plan - Answer-A tool to monitor and measure an employee's
deficient work products, processes, and/or behaviors to improve performance or modify
behavior.

Upward Reviews - Answer-The target employee is reviewed by one or more
subordinates.

Results - Answer-The specific subgoals for each unit that will be the focus of the
performance management process.

Leniency Error - Answer-All employees are given high ratings regardless of
performance.

Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales - Answer-Use a set of behavioral statements
relating to qualities important for performance.

Performance Rating Methods - Answer-Compares employees performance to a set of
standards to identify a number or letter rating that represents the employee's
performance level.

Forced-Choice Rating Method - Answer-Forces the assessor to choose the statement
that best fits the target employee from a provided set of statements that are scored and
weighted in advance.

Accountability - Answer-An individual is expected to provide a regular accounting to a
superior about the results of what she or he is doing and will be held responsible for the
outcome.

Critical Incident Appraisal Method - Answer-An assessor discusses specific examples of
the target employee's positive and negative behaviors with the employee.

Standards - Answer-Specify the level of results considered acceptable.

Performance Plan - Answer-Describes desired goals and results, how results will be
measured and weighted, and what standards will be used to evaluate results.

Similar-to-me- Effect - Answer-Giving high rating to someone because she or he is
perceived as being similar to the rater.

Continuous Performance Appraisal - Answer-An ongoing performance appraisal
process that involves the employee in evaluating his or her performance and setting
performance goals and provides continuous coaching and feedback.

First Impression Bias - Answer-Initial judgments influence later assessments.

, Forced Ranking Method - Answer-Employees are ranked in order of best to worst
performance.

Essay Appraisal Method - Answer-The assessor writes a brief essay providing an
assessment of the strengths, weaknesses, and potential of the target employee.

Work Standards - Answer-Comparing an employee's performance to output targets that
reflect different levels of performance.

Recency Effect - Answer-Allowing recent events and performance to have a
disproportionately large influence on the rating.

Balanced Scorecard - Answer-A performance measurement system that translates the
organization's strategy into financial, business process, learning and growth, and
customer outcomes.

Graphic Rating Scale - Answer-Uses ratings of unsatisfactory, average, above average,
and outstanding to evaluate either work quality or personal traits.

Progressive Discipline - Answer-Using increasingly severe measures when an
employee fails to correct a deficiency after being given a reasonable opportunity to do
so.

Opportunity Bias - Answer-Ignoring factors beyond the employee's control that influence
his or her performance.

Management by objectives - Answer-The rater evaluates the target employee against
mutually set goals.

Contrast Effect - Answer-Over-or underrating someone based on a comparison with
someone else.

High Potential Erro - Answer-Confusing potential with performance.

Halo Effect - Answer-Letting one positive factor influence assessments of the other
areas of behavior or performance.

Behavioral Observation Scales - Answer-Measure the frequency of desired behaviors.

Performance Ranking Methods - Answer-Compares employees to each other in some
way.

Central Tendency - Answer-Rating all employees in the middle of the scale regardless
of performance .

Geschreven voor

Instelling
WGU C202
Vak
WGU C202

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
23 mei 2026
Aantal pagina's
21
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

€13,90
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
victoryguide stuvia
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
27
Lid sinds
1 jaar
Aantal volgers
1
Documenten
3005
Laatst verkocht
1 maand geleden

3,7

10 beoordelingen

5
5
4
0
3
3
2
1
1
1

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen