Afstudeeronderzoek
wetsvoorstel Wet
Gezamenlijk Gezag door
Erkenning
geen ‘’nee, tenzij’’ maar ‘’ja, tenzij’’
Afstudeerscriptie
Naam: Maroesja Post
Studentnummer: 613682
Hogeschool: InHolland Rotterdam
Opleiding: HBO-rechten
Afstudeerrichting: bedrijfsjurist
Afstudeerbegeleider: dhr. J. Woudstra & dhr. D.
Cassuto
Afstudeerbedrijf: Advocatenpraktijk Sangar
Bedrijfsbegeleider: mr. A. Sangar
Aantal woorden: 19.189
,Advocatenpraktijk Sangar Wet Gezamenlijk Gezag door Erkenning Maroesja Post, 613682
Inhoudsopgave
AFKORTINGEN- EN BEGRIPPENLIJST..................................................................................................5
VOORWOORD...................................................................................................................................6
MANAGEMENTSAMENVATTING........................................................................................................7
1. INTRODUCTIE WETSVOORSTEL GEZAMENLIJK GEZAG DOOR ERKENNING .....................................9
1.1 INLEIDING.....................................................................................................................................9
1.2 AANLEIDING..................................................................................................................................9
1.3 PROBLEEMBESCHRIJVING..................................................................................................................9
1.3.1 JURIDISCHE HANDELINGSPROBLEEM........................................................................................................9
1.3.2 HOOFD- EN DEELVRAGEN...................................................................................................................10
1.4 DOELSTELLING.............................................................................................................................10
1.4.1 INTERNE DOELSTELLING......................................................................................................................10
1.4.2 EXTERNE DOELSTELLING.....................................................................................................................10
1.5 LEESWIJZER.................................................................................................................................10
2. ACHTERGROND VAN DE PROBLEEMBESCHRIJVING......................................................................12
2.1 MAATSCHAPPELIJKE CONTEXT..........................................................................................................12
2.1.1 MACRONIVEAU................................................................................................................................12
2.1.2 MESONIVEAU..................................................................................................................................12
2.1.3 MICRONIVEAU.................................................................................................................................13
2.2 ORGANISATORISCHE CONTEXT.........................................................................................................13
2.3 JURIDISCHE CONTEXT.....................................................................................................................14
2.3.1 INTERNATIONALE CONTEXT.................................................................................................................14
2.3.2 NATIONALE CONTEXT........................................................................................................................15
3. METHODOLOGIE..........................................................................................................................17
3.1 TYPE ONDERZOEK.........................................................................................................................17
3.2 HOOFD- EN DEELVRAGEN...............................................................................................................17
3.3 METHODEN EN VERANTWOORDING PER DEELVRAAG.............................................................................17
3.3.1 METHODE DEELVRAAG 1....................................................................................................................17
3.3.2 METHODE DEELVRAAG 2....................................................................................................................18
3.3.3 METHODE DEELVRAAG 3....................................................................................................................18
3.3.4 METHODE DEELVRAAG 4....................................................................................................................19
4. ERKENNING EN GEZAG.................................................................................................................20
4.1 OUDERSCHAP..............................................................................................................................20
4.2 MOEDERSCHAP............................................................................................................................20
4.3 VADERSCHAP...............................................................................................................................20
1
,Advocatenpraktijk Sangar Wet Gezamenlijk Gezag door Erkenning Maroesja Post, 613682
4.4 ERKENNING.................................................................................................................................21
4.4.1 WIJZE VAN ERKENNING......................................................................................................................21
4.4.2 NIETIGE ERKENNING..........................................................................................................................21
4.4.3 VERNIETIGBARE ERKENNING................................................................................................................22
4.5 GEZAG.......................................................................................................................................23
4.6 GEZAMENLIJK GEZAG ONGEHUWDEN.................................................................................................23
4.7 DEELCONCLUSIE...........................................................................................................................24
5. WETTELIJKE VERANDERINGEN WETSVOORSTEL WET GEZAMENLIJK GEZAG DOOR ERKENNING ..26
5.1 NIEUWE HOOFDREGEL...................................................................................................................26
5.2 VOORSTEL VAN DE WET.................................................................................................................26
ONDERDEEL A (ART. 1:247 BW)................................................................................................................26
ONDERDEEL B (ART. 1:247A BW)...............................................................................................................26
ONDERDEEL C (ART. 1:251B BW)...............................................................................................................26
ONDERDEEL D (ART. 1:252 BW)................................................................................................................28
ONDERDEEL E (1:253N BW)......................................................................................................................29
5.3 MOGELIJKE KNELPUNTEN EN EFFECTEN IN BIJZONDERE SITUATIES.............................................................29
5.3.1 GEZAG DOOR ERKENNING BIJ MINDERJARIGE OUDERS..............................................................................29
5.4 RELEVANTE RECHT IN VERGELIJKING MET HET HANDELINGSPROBLEEM.......................................................30
5.5 DEELCONCLUSIE...........................................................................................................................31
6. WERKWIJZE ADVOCATENPRAKTIJK SANGAR...............................................................................32
6.1 INTERVIEW..................................................................................................................................32
6.1.1 KENNISMAKINGSGESPREK...................................................................................................................32
6.1.2 AANDACHTSPUNTEN TIJDENS GESPREK MET CLIËNT.................................................................................32
6.1.3 HUIDIGE WERKWIJZE VAN ADVOCATENPRAKTIJK SANGAR.........................................................................33
6.1.4 BOORDELING ADVISERING..................................................................................................................35
6.1.5 VOOR- EN NADELEN WETSVOORSTEL WET GEZAMENLIJK GEZAG DOOR ERKENNING......................................35
6.2 HUIDIGE PRAKTIJK IN VERGELIJKING MET HET HANDELINGSPROBLEEM.......................................................35
6.2.1 HET BETER WAARBORGEN BELANG KIND................................................................................................36
6.2.2 HET WEGNEMEN VAN HET ONDERSCHEID TUSSEN GEHUWDEN EN ONGEHUWDEN OUDERS..............................36
6.2.3 HET AANPASSEN VAN DE WET.............................................................................................................36
6.2.4 HET WEGNEMEN VAN PROBLEMEN DIE DOOR DE HUIDIGE REGELGEVING WORDEN VEROORZAAKT....................36
6.3 DEELCONCLUSIE...........................................................................................................................36
7. VERSCHILLEN WERKWIJZE ADVOCATENPRAKTIJK SANGAR EN WETSVOORSTEL WET
GEZAMENLIJK GEZAG DOOR ERKENNING........................................................................................38
7.1 DE JURIDISCHE WERKWIJZE VAN ADVOCATENPRAKTIJK SANGAR IN VERGELIJKING MET HET WETSVOORSTEL WET
GEZAMENLIJK GEZAG DOOR ERKENNING.................................................................................................38
7.1.1 GERECHTELIJKE VASTSTELLING VADERSCHAP...........................................................................................38
7.1.2 VERVANGENDE TOESTEMMING ERKENNING............................................................................................38
7.1.3 VERNIETIGING ERKENNING..................................................................................................................39
7.1.4 AANVRAGEN GEZAMENLIJK GEZAG.......................................................................................................39
7.1.5 BEËINDIGEN GEZAMENLIJK GEZAG........................................................................................................40
7.2 DEELCONCLUSIE...........................................................................................................................40
2
, Advocatenpraktijk Sangar Wet Gezamenlijk Gezag door Erkenning Maroesja Post, 613682
8. CONCLUSIES.................................................................................................................................42
8.1 CONCLUSIES DEELVRAGEN...............................................................................................................42
8.1.1 CONCLUSIE DEELVRAAG I...................................................................................................................42
8.1.2 CONCLUSIE DEELVRAAG II..................................................................................................................42
8.1.3 CONCLUSIE DEELVRAAG III..................................................................................................................42
8.1.4 CONCLUSIE DEELVRAAG IV.................................................................................................................42
8.2 CONCLUSIE HOOFDVRAAG..............................................................................................................43
9. AANBEVELINGEN.........................................................................................................................45
9.1 ADVIESMEMO..............................................................................................................................45
9.2 VOORSTEL INTERN BELEID...............................................................................................................45
9.3 CURSUS MEDIATION......................................................................................................................45
10. REFLECTIE..................................................................................................................................46
10.1 REFLECTIE INHOUDELIJKE KEUZES....................................................................................................46
10.2 REFLECTIE ONDERZOEKSRESULTATEN...............................................................................................46
10.3 REFLECTIE DOELSTELLING..............................................................................................................46
10.4 REFLECTIE EIGEN ONTWIKKELING....................................................................................................47
BIBLIOGRAFIE..................................................................................................................................49
BIJLAGE I: HET INTERVIEWSCHEMA.................................................................................................51
BIJLAGE II: GETRANSCRIBEERD INTERVIEW......................................................................................53
BIJLAGE III: ANALYSETABEL..............................................................................................................63
BIJLAGE IV: ADVIESMEMO...............................................................................................................75
MANAGEMENTSAMENVATTING.............................................................................................................75
1. AANLEIDING.........................................................................................................................................75
2. JURIDISCHE HANDELINGSPROBLEEM...........................................................................................................75
3. DE HOOFDVRAAG..................................................................................................................................75
4. RESULTATEN EN CONCLUSIES...................................................................................................................76
INHOUDSOPGAVE...............................................................................................................................77
1. INLEIDING.....................................................................................................................................78
1.1 OPDRACHT EN DOEL VAN DE ADVIESMEMO INTRODUCEREN.........................................................................78
1.2 ONDERZOEK INTRODUCEREN..................................................................................................................78
1.3 RANDVOORWAARDEN..........................................................................................................................79
1.3 LEESWIJZER........................................................................................................................................80
2. ONDERZOEK..................................................................................................................................81
2.1 RESULTATEN.......................................................................................................................................81
3. CONCLUSIE...................................................................................................................................85
3.1 CONCLUSIES DEELVRAGEN.....................................................................................................................85
3.2 CONCLUSIE HOOFDVRAAG.....................................................................................................................86
3
wetsvoorstel Wet
Gezamenlijk Gezag door
Erkenning
geen ‘’nee, tenzij’’ maar ‘’ja, tenzij’’
Afstudeerscriptie
Naam: Maroesja Post
Studentnummer: 613682
Hogeschool: InHolland Rotterdam
Opleiding: HBO-rechten
Afstudeerrichting: bedrijfsjurist
Afstudeerbegeleider: dhr. J. Woudstra & dhr. D.
Cassuto
Afstudeerbedrijf: Advocatenpraktijk Sangar
Bedrijfsbegeleider: mr. A. Sangar
Aantal woorden: 19.189
,Advocatenpraktijk Sangar Wet Gezamenlijk Gezag door Erkenning Maroesja Post, 613682
Inhoudsopgave
AFKORTINGEN- EN BEGRIPPENLIJST..................................................................................................5
VOORWOORD...................................................................................................................................6
MANAGEMENTSAMENVATTING........................................................................................................7
1. INTRODUCTIE WETSVOORSTEL GEZAMENLIJK GEZAG DOOR ERKENNING .....................................9
1.1 INLEIDING.....................................................................................................................................9
1.2 AANLEIDING..................................................................................................................................9
1.3 PROBLEEMBESCHRIJVING..................................................................................................................9
1.3.1 JURIDISCHE HANDELINGSPROBLEEM........................................................................................................9
1.3.2 HOOFD- EN DEELVRAGEN...................................................................................................................10
1.4 DOELSTELLING.............................................................................................................................10
1.4.1 INTERNE DOELSTELLING......................................................................................................................10
1.4.2 EXTERNE DOELSTELLING.....................................................................................................................10
1.5 LEESWIJZER.................................................................................................................................10
2. ACHTERGROND VAN DE PROBLEEMBESCHRIJVING......................................................................12
2.1 MAATSCHAPPELIJKE CONTEXT..........................................................................................................12
2.1.1 MACRONIVEAU................................................................................................................................12
2.1.2 MESONIVEAU..................................................................................................................................12
2.1.3 MICRONIVEAU.................................................................................................................................13
2.2 ORGANISATORISCHE CONTEXT.........................................................................................................13
2.3 JURIDISCHE CONTEXT.....................................................................................................................14
2.3.1 INTERNATIONALE CONTEXT.................................................................................................................14
2.3.2 NATIONALE CONTEXT........................................................................................................................15
3. METHODOLOGIE..........................................................................................................................17
3.1 TYPE ONDERZOEK.........................................................................................................................17
3.2 HOOFD- EN DEELVRAGEN...............................................................................................................17
3.3 METHODEN EN VERANTWOORDING PER DEELVRAAG.............................................................................17
3.3.1 METHODE DEELVRAAG 1....................................................................................................................17
3.3.2 METHODE DEELVRAAG 2....................................................................................................................18
3.3.3 METHODE DEELVRAAG 3....................................................................................................................18
3.3.4 METHODE DEELVRAAG 4....................................................................................................................19
4. ERKENNING EN GEZAG.................................................................................................................20
4.1 OUDERSCHAP..............................................................................................................................20
4.2 MOEDERSCHAP............................................................................................................................20
4.3 VADERSCHAP...............................................................................................................................20
1
,Advocatenpraktijk Sangar Wet Gezamenlijk Gezag door Erkenning Maroesja Post, 613682
4.4 ERKENNING.................................................................................................................................21
4.4.1 WIJZE VAN ERKENNING......................................................................................................................21
4.4.2 NIETIGE ERKENNING..........................................................................................................................21
4.4.3 VERNIETIGBARE ERKENNING................................................................................................................22
4.5 GEZAG.......................................................................................................................................23
4.6 GEZAMENLIJK GEZAG ONGEHUWDEN.................................................................................................23
4.7 DEELCONCLUSIE...........................................................................................................................24
5. WETTELIJKE VERANDERINGEN WETSVOORSTEL WET GEZAMENLIJK GEZAG DOOR ERKENNING ..26
5.1 NIEUWE HOOFDREGEL...................................................................................................................26
5.2 VOORSTEL VAN DE WET.................................................................................................................26
ONDERDEEL A (ART. 1:247 BW)................................................................................................................26
ONDERDEEL B (ART. 1:247A BW)...............................................................................................................26
ONDERDEEL C (ART. 1:251B BW)...............................................................................................................26
ONDERDEEL D (ART. 1:252 BW)................................................................................................................28
ONDERDEEL E (1:253N BW)......................................................................................................................29
5.3 MOGELIJKE KNELPUNTEN EN EFFECTEN IN BIJZONDERE SITUATIES.............................................................29
5.3.1 GEZAG DOOR ERKENNING BIJ MINDERJARIGE OUDERS..............................................................................29
5.4 RELEVANTE RECHT IN VERGELIJKING MET HET HANDELINGSPROBLEEM.......................................................30
5.5 DEELCONCLUSIE...........................................................................................................................31
6. WERKWIJZE ADVOCATENPRAKTIJK SANGAR...............................................................................32
6.1 INTERVIEW..................................................................................................................................32
6.1.1 KENNISMAKINGSGESPREK...................................................................................................................32
6.1.2 AANDACHTSPUNTEN TIJDENS GESPREK MET CLIËNT.................................................................................32
6.1.3 HUIDIGE WERKWIJZE VAN ADVOCATENPRAKTIJK SANGAR.........................................................................33
6.1.4 BOORDELING ADVISERING..................................................................................................................35
6.1.5 VOOR- EN NADELEN WETSVOORSTEL WET GEZAMENLIJK GEZAG DOOR ERKENNING......................................35
6.2 HUIDIGE PRAKTIJK IN VERGELIJKING MET HET HANDELINGSPROBLEEM.......................................................35
6.2.1 HET BETER WAARBORGEN BELANG KIND................................................................................................36
6.2.2 HET WEGNEMEN VAN HET ONDERSCHEID TUSSEN GEHUWDEN EN ONGEHUWDEN OUDERS..............................36
6.2.3 HET AANPASSEN VAN DE WET.............................................................................................................36
6.2.4 HET WEGNEMEN VAN PROBLEMEN DIE DOOR DE HUIDIGE REGELGEVING WORDEN VEROORZAAKT....................36
6.3 DEELCONCLUSIE...........................................................................................................................36
7. VERSCHILLEN WERKWIJZE ADVOCATENPRAKTIJK SANGAR EN WETSVOORSTEL WET
GEZAMENLIJK GEZAG DOOR ERKENNING........................................................................................38
7.1 DE JURIDISCHE WERKWIJZE VAN ADVOCATENPRAKTIJK SANGAR IN VERGELIJKING MET HET WETSVOORSTEL WET
GEZAMENLIJK GEZAG DOOR ERKENNING.................................................................................................38
7.1.1 GERECHTELIJKE VASTSTELLING VADERSCHAP...........................................................................................38
7.1.2 VERVANGENDE TOESTEMMING ERKENNING............................................................................................38
7.1.3 VERNIETIGING ERKENNING..................................................................................................................39
7.1.4 AANVRAGEN GEZAMENLIJK GEZAG.......................................................................................................39
7.1.5 BEËINDIGEN GEZAMENLIJK GEZAG........................................................................................................40
7.2 DEELCONCLUSIE...........................................................................................................................40
2
, Advocatenpraktijk Sangar Wet Gezamenlijk Gezag door Erkenning Maroesja Post, 613682
8. CONCLUSIES.................................................................................................................................42
8.1 CONCLUSIES DEELVRAGEN...............................................................................................................42
8.1.1 CONCLUSIE DEELVRAAG I...................................................................................................................42
8.1.2 CONCLUSIE DEELVRAAG II..................................................................................................................42
8.1.3 CONCLUSIE DEELVRAAG III..................................................................................................................42
8.1.4 CONCLUSIE DEELVRAAG IV.................................................................................................................42
8.2 CONCLUSIE HOOFDVRAAG..............................................................................................................43
9. AANBEVELINGEN.........................................................................................................................45
9.1 ADVIESMEMO..............................................................................................................................45
9.2 VOORSTEL INTERN BELEID...............................................................................................................45
9.3 CURSUS MEDIATION......................................................................................................................45
10. REFLECTIE..................................................................................................................................46
10.1 REFLECTIE INHOUDELIJKE KEUZES....................................................................................................46
10.2 REFLECTIE ONDERZOEKSRESULTATEN...............................................................................................46
10.3 REFLECTIE DOELSTELLING..............................................................................................................46
10.4 REFLECTIE EIGEN ONTWIKKELING....................................................................................................47
BIBLIOGRAFIE..................................................................................................................................49
BIJLAGE I: HET INTERVIEWSCHEMA.................................................................................................51
BIJLAGE II: GETRANSCRIBEERD INTERVIEW......................................................................................53
BIJLAGE III: ANALYSETABEL..............................................................................................................63
BIJLAGE IV: ADVIESMEMO...............................................................................................................75
MANAGEMENTSAMENVATTING.............................................................................................................75
1. AANLEIDING.........................................................................................................................................75
2. JURIDISCHE HANDELINGSPROBLEEM...........................................................................................................75
3. DE HOOFDVRAAG..................................................................................................................................75
4. RESULTATEN EN CONCLUSIES...................................................................................................................76
INHOUDSOPGAVE...............................................................................................................................77
1. INLEIDING.....................................................................................................................................78
1.1 OPDRACHT EN DOEL VAN DE ADVIESMEMO INTRODUCEREN.........................................................................78
1.2 ONDERZOEK INTRODUCEREN..................................................................................................................78
1.3 RANDVOORWAARDEN..........................................................................................................................79
1.3 LEESWIJZER........................................................................................................................................80
2. ONDERZOEK..................................................................................................................................81
2.1 RESULTATEN.......................................................................................................................................81
3. CONCLUSIE...................................................................................................................................85
3.1 CONCLUSIES DEELVRAGEN.....................................................................................................................85
3.2 CONCLUSIE HOOFDVRAAG.....................................................................................................................86
3
