Victimologie Samenvatting Artikelen Week 1-4
Week 1:
1. van Dijk, J. J. M., Groenhuijsen, M. S., & Winkel, F. W. (2007). Victimologie: Voorgeschiedenis
en stand van zaken. Justitiële verkenningen: Documentatieblad van het Ministerie van
Justitie, 33(3), 9-29.
2. O’Connell, M. (2008). Victimology: A social science in waiting? International Review of
Victimology, 15, 91-104.
Week 2:
1. Dijk, J.J. van (2009). Free the victim: A critique of the western conception of victimhood.
International Review of Victimology, 16 (1), 1-33.
2. Fohring, S (2018). Revisiting the non-ideal victim. In: M. Duggan (Red.). Revisiting the “Ideal
Victim”: Developments in Critical Victimology (pp.195-209). Bristol University Press.
3. Hafer, C.L. & Sutton, R.M. (2016). Belief in a Just World. In: C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Red.)
Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research (pp.145-160). Dit artikel staat er voor de
helft in i.v.m een vraag in afwachting, de andere helft voeg ik straks toe bij een nieuw
document met week 5-7.
Week 3:
1. Averdijk, M., & Bernasco W. (2015). Testing the situational explanation of victimisation
among adolescents. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52 (2), 151-180.
2. Jennings, W.G., Piquero, A.R., & Reingle, J.M. (2012). On the overlap between victimisation
and offending: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17 (1), 16-26.
3. Schreck, C.J. (1999). Criminal victimisation and low self-control: An extension and test of a
general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly, 16 (3), 633-654.
Week 4:
1. Hanson, R.F., Begle, A.M. & Hubel, G.S. (2010). The Impact of Crime Victimisation on Quality
of Life. Journal of Traumatic Stress, Vol. 23, (2), 189–197
2. Hanson Frieze, I., Hymer, S., & Greenberg, M.S. (1987). Describing the Crime Victim:
Psychological Reactions to Victimization. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18
(4), 299-315.
3. van der Velden, P.G., Contino, C., van de Ven, P., Das, M. (2021). The use of professional help
and predictors of unmet needs for dealing with mental health to legal problems among
victims of violence, accidents, theft and threat, and nonvictims in the general population.
Week 1:
1. van Dijk, J. J. M., Groenhuijsen, M. S., & Winkel, F. W. (2007). Victimologie: Voorgeschiedenis
en stand van zaken. Justitiële verkenningen: Documentatieblad van het Ministerie van
Justitie, 33(3), 9-29.
2. O’Connell, M. (2008). Victimology: A social science in waiting? International Review of
Victimology, 15, 91-104.
Week 2:
1. Dijk, J.J. van (2009). Free the victim: A critique of the western conception of victimhood.
International Review of Victimology, 16 (1), 1-33.
2. Fohring, S (2018). Revisiting the non-ideal victim. In: M. Duggan (Red.). Revisiting the “Ideal
Victim”: Developments in Critical Victimology (pp.195-209). Bristol University Press.
3. Hafer, C.L. & Sutton, R.M. (2016). Belief in a Just World. In: C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Red.)
Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research (pp.145-160). Dit artikel staat er voor de
helft in i.v.m een vraag in afwachting, de andere helft voeg ik straks toe bij een nieuw
document met week 5-7.
Week 3:
1. Averdijk, M., & Bernasco W. (2015). Testing the situational explanation of victimisation
among adolescents. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52 (2), 151-180.
2. Jennings, W.G., Piquero, A.R., & Reingle, J.M. (2012). On the overlap between victimisation
and offending: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17 (1), 16-26.
3. Schreck, C.J. (1999). Criminal victimisation and low self-control: An extension and test of a
general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly, 16 (3), 633-654.
Week 4:
1. Hanson, R.F., Begle, A.M. & Hubel, G.S. (2010). The Impact of Crime Victimisation on Quality
of Life. Journal of Traumatic Stress, Vol. 23, (2), 189–197
2. Hanson Frieze, I., Hymer, S., & Greenberg, M.S. (1987). Describing the Crime Victim:
Psychological Reactions to Victimization. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18
(4), 299-315.
3. van der Velden, P.G., Contino, C., van de Ven, P., Das, M. (2021). The use of professional help
and predictors of unmet needs for dealing with mental health to legal problems among
victims of violence, accidents, theft and threat, and nonvictims in the general population.
