Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
College aantekeningen

College aantekeningen Quantitative Research Methods III (E_EBE3_QRMAM)

Beoordeling
3,5
(2)
Verkocht
13
Pagina's
46
Geüpload op
24-01-2023
Geschreven in
2021/2022

Samenvatting van QRM 3 Vrije Universiteit. (Accounting en Marketing track)

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

QRM III
Monday lecture
Wednesday lecture
Thursday ISC and Tutorial

Inductive reasoning: drawing a conclusion based on an observation
• Outcome of inductive reasoning is one or more hypotheses
Deductive reasoning: conclusion follows from a set of reasons (premises)
• Begins with a hypothesis

Possibility to combine these in research process.

More valid for deductive reasoning: research process
Theory → constructs/concepts → variables

Hypothesis: expected relationship between variables based on a theory.
- Descriptive hypothesis
o Value of one variable
o 80% of students pass the QRM course
- Rational hypothesis
o Relationship between 2 variables of one case
o Students who spend more time eon the QRM course get a higher grade

Theory: a set of interrelated concepts, definitions, and propositions to explain and predict
phenomena.
→ theory is not the opposite of a fact

Construct: conceived (by the researcher) specifically for the study or for the theory building
- Difficult to observe
- Often built from concepts
- E.g., yuppies, composed of concepts (age, type of car)

Dependent variable: the variable that we want to explain
Independent variable: variable that explains (in part) the dependent variable
Moderating variable: the strength of the relationship between a dependent and independent
variable is affected by a moderating variable
Intervening variable: the influence of an independent variable on a dependent variable is
through an intervening variable.




Hallmarks of scientific research

, • Purposiveness: the supervisor or the manager of an organization has started the
research for a specific purpose.
• Rigor: carefulness, honesty, and the degree of accuracy in research investigations.
• Testability: researcher develops a hypothesis on how for instance, employee
commitment can be improved
• Replicability: we repeat the test of hypotheses again and again for the better outcomes.
• Precision and confidence: precision reflects the degree of accuracy of the results based
on the sample to what really exists in the universe. Confidence refers to the probability
that out estimations are correct.
• Objectivity: data analysis should be based on the facts of the findings based on actual
data
• Generalizability: scope of applicability of the research findings in one organizational
setting to other settings.
• Parsimony: it can be introduced with a good understanding of the problem and the
important factors that influence it.




Descriptive research
- Inventory of level of absenteeism
- How often does something occur
- Reasons/possible causes why something occurs do not attend

Causal research
- Testing cause and effect relationships
- What factors lead to difference in absenteeism?

Descriptive research → inductive reasoning → exploratory

,Causal research → deductive reasoning → hypothesis testing

Exploratory vs formal (hypothesis testing)
Exploratory
- Looser design
- Aim is to develop theories that can be tested in further research
- Ends with the formulation of hypotheses

Formal (hypothesis testing)
- Begins with the hypotheses
- Established procedure for hypothesis testing

Role of the researcher
Contrived setting: artificially created environment
Non-contrived: a natural environment
• Manipulation
• Simulation
• Controlled environment

Intensive vs extensive design
Intensive design: Intensively investigate a case
• Case study. Invite 5 students for an interview
Extensive design: Investigate many cases less deeply
• Standardized survey of 70 students. Questions 1 to 5 scale

CAUSALITY
Conditions
→ A occurs before B (timing is important: cause takes place before the effect)
→ there is an association between A and B
→ there is no other variable that can lead to B
Causality is usually established based on deductive reasoning. It cannot be determined
empirically with certainty




.
Answer C

, Unit of Analysis
Level at which the variable is measured
Variables in hypotheses have the same unit of analysis

Time aspect
Cross-sectional
- Measurement at one point in time
- Relationships among variables at a point in time
- If variable A is higher than B is higher
- Basis of comparison is other respondents

Longitudinal
- Over time or time series
- Collect data from the same unit at multiple times
- If A increase in time, then B increases

Manipulation
Experimental research
→ IV is manipulated then influence on DV is measured

Ex post facto design
→ the effect of IVs on the DV is examined; IVs are not manipulated




Randomization
Randomly allocating participants to different groups (treatment and control group)
Ensures that confounding (extraneous) variables (EVs) are equally distributed across groups.

If we measure a difference in the DV between the 2 groups, it is only attributable to the IV
(treatment)

Influence of randomization on causality?
- Third condition of causality. If everything goes well then random allocation will take
care of that.

Control variables: include variables that (may) explain the dependent variable, but are not
directly relevant to our study

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
24 januari 2023
Aantal pagina's
46
Geschreven in
2021/2022
Type
College aantekeningen
Docent(en)
Sasovova
Bevat
Alle colleges
€9,99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle 2 reviews worden weergegeven
2 jaar geleden

3 jaar geleden

3,5

2 beoordelingen

5
0
4
1
3
1
2
0
1
0
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
annevdijk27 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
14
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
9
Documenten
3
Laatst verkocht
1 maand geleden

3,5

2 beoordelingen

5
0
4
1
3
1
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen