Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
College aantekeningen

Neuropsychological Assessment: Uitwerkingen Hoorcolleges

Beoordeling
5,0
(1)
Verkocht
4
Pagina's
67
Geüpload op
10-12-2016
Geschreven in
2016/2017

De uitwerkingen van de hoorcolleges van Neuropsychological Assessment (2016/2017) aangevuld met eigen aantekeningen tijdens de colleges.

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Lecture 1 ‘Introduction’
What is Clinical Neuropsychology?

 The APA defines Clinical Neuropsychology as “a specialty that applies principles of
assessment and intervention based upon the scientific study of human behaviour as it relates to
normal and abnormal functioning of the Central Nervous System (CNS)”.
 The Study of brain/behaviour relationships & impact of injury/disease on cognitive, emotional
and general adaptive capacities of the individual.
Clinical Neuropsychologists need to have an understanding of functional neuroanatomy, neurological
disorders, psychopathology and theoretical background and psychometric properties of the used tests.
Psychology has an influence on what a (neuropsychological) patient does in his daily life, whether or
not he follows his treatment well, takes his medicines, if he shows up at treatment, how he feels etc.
That is why psychopathology is so important in neuropsychological assessment.
Neuropsychological assessment is “another method of examining the brain by studying its
behavioural product” (Lezak et al.). The behavioural effects of brain damage vary with:

 Nature, extent, location and duration of the lesion(s) and/or malfunctioning of the neural
networks.
 Age, sex, physical condition, psychosocial background and status of the patient.
 With individual neuroanatomical and physiological differences.
Because a scan can only show what the brain looks like, we examine the behavioural problems. This
so that we can see how the brain seems to work and/or how the person feels.
The goal of neuropsychological assessment isn’t just about gathering test data but in understanding the
behaviour of the patient in the context of the environment in which he functions. Major purposes of
neuropsychological assessment are:
1. Differential diagnosis: trying to figure out why it is this form (of dementia for example) and
not another form.
2. Planning treatment
3. Following the course of rehabilitation
4. Legal proceedings
Anatomy of the brain:

,A very simplified overview of the structures and functions of the brain:

Function Brain structures implied
Attention All areas (but especially frontal)
Perception Visual cortex (occipital lobe)
Memory Hippocampus, thalamus, M.Bs, fornix,
prefrontal
Language Left hemisphere, Broca’s, Wernicke’s
Executive Functions Frontal cortex and feedback loops
Movement Basal ganglia (pons/medulla), cerebellum,
cortex
Emotion Amygdala, cortex, right hemisphere
(Plasticity is important to keep in mind here!)
Attentional deficits are the most common problems in neuropsychological patients, this is because all
the areas of the brain are involved in attention.
The younger you are, the more likely it is that the brain can recover after a brain trauma. Recovery
however is not a natural given; not everybody recovers (or only a little bit).
Global issues in neuropsychological assessment:

 Populations – all ages.
 Comorbidity is more common in the elderly as is polypharmacy.
 Maximizing the patient’s performance (strengths and weaknesses).
 Individual differences often seem to be more ‘marked’ in brain-damaged individuals (may see
extremes of behaviour. They don’t respond the way you expect).
 Determining premorbid level of functioning is crucial (what has changed in the person? You
need to know the baseline).
Comorbidity means ‘two diseases or more, that come together in one person’. Polypharmacy means
taking multiple medicines.
Psychometrics includes consideration of:

 Reliability
 Validity and validation (most fundamental property of psychometric tests!).
 Norms and skewing.
 Standardizing scores and why important.
 Correlations that exist between tests (avoid redundant testing).
The test is good if it:

 Has ecological validity (measures what is purports to measure).
 Covers all relevant behavioural domains of interest.
 Avoids ‘floor’ and ‘ceiling’ effects.
 Patient can understand what they have to do.
 Easy to administer and score.
 Comparable with other investigators’ work.
 Has more than one version/form (reduces redundancy).
You need to know what the tests are and what they measure, and so on. Most important from this list
is the ecological validity: you want to know how that person functions in daily life and your test has to
measure that in order to be efficient.

, Procedures in neuropsychological assessment:

 Patient typically undergoes a neurology examination.
 Referral
 Deciding which approach to take: fixed battery of flexible approach? You have to ask yourself
questions before seeing the patient.
 The clinical interview.
 Gathering a case history.
 Neuropsychological testing.
 Deriving a level of premorbid functioning.
 Scoring and comparison with age-appropriate norms.
 Making a diagnosis and recommendation for treatment, and report writing (ask who your
reader will be in order to know how and what to write).
 Client feedback and possible follow-up.
Neurology exam and laboratory exams:

 Neurology: motor functions, sensations, reflexes, Brief Mental Status examination.
 Laboratory exams: CT, MRI, fMRI, SPECT, PET, EEG, ERP – not always useful. Even when
lesion site is known you still need assessment to determine the strengths and weaknesses of
the patient. Other laboratory exams are angiography, CSF (lumbar punctures) etc.
The clinical interview:

 Importance of client-tester empathy.
 Start with open-ended questions.
 Get progressively more specific.
 Can use checklists to help you.
 Partner/spouse (proxy – in interview or separate interview?)
 The art of observation – qualitative functioning?
An interview with the partner is best to conduct both together as separate from the neuropsychological
patient. Separate interviews can show you whether or not the answers become more honest, whether or
not the patient feels less pressure, and if the answers from the patient and the partner are similar. It
also prevents that the partner answers for the patient and so on. After separate interviews you can
interview them together to see how they respond at each other.
Observation: Test results say little without integrating them into an overall picture of the patient.
There is indirect vs. direct observation possible. A checklist of possible observations relevant during
testing:

 Physical condition.
 Communication between patient and tester.
 Orientation, understanding of the situation, sociable?
 Emotional reactions.
 How the person tackles the testing (motivated etc.?)
 Functioning of the senses.
 Movement.
 Speech and language.
 Attention and concentration.
 Anything unusual?

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
10 december 2016
Bestand laatst geupdate op
13 december 2016
Aantal pagina's
67
Geschreven in
2016/2017
Type
College aantekeningen
Docent(en)
Onbekend
Bevat
Alle colleges
€3,49
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Thumbnail
Voordeelbundel
Bachelor Psychologie & Gezondheid - Jaar 3
-
1 10 2017
€ 10,99 Meer info

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle reviews worden weergegeven
6 jaar geleden

5,0

1 beoordelingen

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
AnoukVroegindeweij1 Tilburg University
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
796
Lid sinds
11 jaar
Aantal volgers
424
Documenten
38
Laatst verkocht
7 maanden geleden

3,9

110 beoordelingen

5
25
4
55
3
24
2
4
1
2

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen