Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

FUR2601 Exam Pack 2025

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
1
Pagina's
151
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
18-06-2023
Geschreven in
2025/2026

Ace your FUR2601 with this exam pack containing past exam papers and memorandums for each paper FUR2601 Exam Pack 2025 (Fundamental Rights) A+... All you need to ace the exam)... 2025 FUR2601 Exam Pack... FUR2601 Exam 2025... October November Exam 2025... Semester 2 Exam 2025 FUR2601 Exam Pack 2025 (Fundamental Rights) A+

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

FUR2601
Fundamental Rights




2023 Updated Exam Pack

,NB: This document is an additional tool
for exam preparation. The Stuvia-user
that compiled and uploaded this
document takes no responsibility for
incorrect answers. Students must
ensure that they study the prescribed
material and understand the content.

,2021-201/1/2021
TRUE AND FALSE FIRST COMPULSORY ASSIGNMENT-For the first assignment, you were required to select the
correct answer.

1. In the substantive stage of Bill of Rights litigation, the onus is first on the respondent, who must show that he/she
infringed the applicant’s rights.

1) False, in the substantive stage, the onus is first on the applicant, who must show that an infringement of a right has taken
place.

2) True, in the substantive stage, the onus is first on the respondent, who must show that he/she infringed the applicant’s
rights.

3) False, in the substantive stage the onus is on the respondent to indicate that the applicant’s rights can be limited.

4) False, in the substantive stage, the onus is on the applicant, to show that the infringement is not justifiable in terms of
section 36 of the Constitution.

Answer: 1) False, in the substantive stage, the onus is first on the applicant, who must show that an infringement of a right
has taken place.

2. Section 8(4) of the Constitution provides that juristic persons are specifically excluded from the protection of the rights in
the Bill of Rights.

1) True, section 8(4) of the Constitution excludes juristic persons from the protection of the rights in the Bill of Rights because
of the nature of these rights and the nature of juristic persons.

2) False, section 8(4) of the Constitution provides that juristic persons are entitled to the rights in the Bill of Rights dependant
on the nature of the right and the nature of the juristic person.

3) True, section 8(4) of the Constitution provides that only natural persons can lay claim to the rights in the Bill of Rights.

4) False, section 8(4) of the Constitution provides that all juristic persons are entitled to all the rights in the Bill of Rights.

Answer: 2) False, section 8(4) of the Constitution provides that juristic persons are entitled to the rights in the Bill of Rights
dependant on the nature of the right and the nature of the juristic person.

3. Section 39 of the Constitution, the interpretation clause, provides that any court, tribunal or forum, when interpreting the
Bill of Rights may consider international law and must consider foreign law.

1) False, section 39 of the Constitution provides that any court, tribunal or forum when interpreting the Bill of Rights, must
consider international law and may consider foreign law.

2) True, section 39 of the Constitution provides that any court, tribunal or forum when interpreting the Bill of Rights, may
consider international law and must consider foreign law.

3) False, section 39 of the Constitution provides that any court, tribunal or forum should only consider national law when
interpreting the rights in the Bill of Rights.

4) True, section 39 of the Constitution provides that any court, tribunal or forum, when interpreting the Bill of Rights may
consider international law and must consider foreign law, however, only as far as it pertains to matters of state security.

Answer: 1) False, section 39 of the Constitution provides that any court, tribunal or forum when interpreting the Bill of
Rights, must consider international law and may consider foreign law.

, 4. In Fose v Minister of Safety and Security the Constitutional Court found that the term “appropriate relief” referred to a
declaration of invalidity that would be the only applicable relief in the event of a constitutional rights violation.

1) True, in Fose v Minister of Safety and Security the Constitutional Court found that the term “appropriate relief” referred to a
declaration of invalidity that would be the only applicable relief in the event of a constitutional rights violation.

2) False, in Ferreira v Levin the Constitutional Court found that the term “appropriate relief” referred to a declaration of
invalidity that would be the only applicable relief in the event of a constitutional rights violation.

3) True, in Fose v Minister of Safety and Security the Constitutional Court found that the term appropriate relief referred to a
declaration of invalidity as a discretionary remedy in the event of a constitutional rights violation.

4) False, in Fose v Minister of Safety and Security the Constitutional Court found that it was left to the courts to decide what
appropriate relief would be in any particular circumstances.

Answer: 4) False, in Fose v Minister of Safety and Security the Constitutional Court found that it was left to the courts to
decide what appropriate relief would be in any particular circumstances.

5. In Mazibuko v City of Johannesburg the Constitutional Court found that the right to water did not require the state to
provide every person with sufficient water on demand.

1) True, the Constitutional Court found that that the city's free basic water policy was a reasonable measure of achieving the
progressive realisation of the right to water.

2) False, the Constitutional Court found that every citizen has the right to unlimited clean water.

3) True, the Constitutional Court found that the right to water can be restricted if municipalities struggle to source clean water.

4) False, the Constitutional Court found that the right to water could reasonably be restricted to 2 litres of water per person per
day.

Answer: 1) True, the Constitutional Court found that that the city's free basic water policy was a reasonable measure of
achieving the progressive realisation of the right to water.


Tutorial letter 201/1/2020
1.1 FIRST COMPULSORY ASSIGNMENT- For the first assignment, you were required to select the
correct answer.
1. Vertical application of the Bill of Rights refers to the application of the Bill of Rights to a dispute between private parties,
where the constitutionality of legislations is not at issue. (2)

1) True, vertical application of the Bill of Rights is only applicable between private parties.

2) False, vertical application refers to the application of the Bill of Rights to a dispute, which concerns the constitutionality of
legislation, or a dispute to which the state is a party.

3) False, the Bill of Rights can only be applied horizontally.

4) True, with vertical application of the Bill of Rights the constitutionality of legislation is always not at issue.

Answer: 2) False, vertical application refers to the application of the Bill of Rights to a dispute, which concerns the
constitutionality of legislation, or a dispute to which the state is a party.

2. To prove that one is acting in the public interest in terms of section 38(d) of the Constitution, one has to show that one is
acting in the public interest and that the public has sufficient interest in the remedy. (2)

1) False, to prove that one is acting in the public interest in terms of section 38(d) of the Constitution, one has to show that one
is acting in the public interest and that the public has personal interest in the remedy sought.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
18 juni 2023
Aantal pagina's
151
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

€5,42
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
VarsityTimesSA University of South Africa (Unisa)
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
2280
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
1374
Documenten
921
Laatst verkocht
4 uur geleden
VTSA

Let us help you with your academic journey...

4,1

271 beoordelingen

5
150
4
38
3
51
2
11
1
21

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen