Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
College aantekeningen

Assessment in organizations - samenvatting

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
6
Pagina's
25
Geüpload op
06-09-2023
Geschreven in
2022/2023

Volledig overzicht met alles wat je nodig hebt om het vak 'Assessment in organizations' te halen. Met plaatjes, overzichten, stappenplannen en tabellen. Duidelijk de theorie puntsgewijs samengevat. 7,5 voor het schriftelijke tentamen gehaald. Vak in het Engels gegeven dus aantekeningen en begrippen ook in het Engels.

Meer zien Lees minder

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Assessment in organizations




Hoorcollege 1: introduction & fundamental assumptions

Individual assessment = the use of measurements (tests/assessments) used in an
organizational/work context to make employee-related decisions.

Measurements

- Interview
- Personality questionnaire
- Intelligence test
- Assessment centre

3 goal assessment, op 3
niveaus analyse
Diagnose – individual/team/organization
Development/change –
individual/team/organization
Exploration –
individual/team/organization



What is the use of assessment?
 Individual/group differences in performance matter:

- People have skills and other qualities
- These skills relate to job performance
- Relative differences in these skills are fairly stable, so people with higher skill levels will
perform better
- People differ in work performance and different jobs require different skills
- Required skills can be measured

What should an assessment meet?

(1) Reliable, valid, practical to use, produce the right results, fair to all concerned and not lead to
discriminatory effects for groups of people
(2) Fairness/non-discriminatory recruitment and promotion process

Basic model of individual assessment



Constructs = mental constructs, which derive
scientific value from shared meaning for
different people. Building blocks for theories

Measurements = observable, represent
constructs, used to test theories.

,Predictor constructs: intelligence, personality, motivation
Criterion constructs: overall performance, citizenship behavior, absence
Predictor measures: selection interview, intelligence tests, graphology
Criterion measure: manager rating/evaluation, personnel data, BARS, 360 ratings


Predictive hypothesis =
(a) Tussen 2 measures
(predictor&criterion)
(empirical, observed in
research)
(b) Tussen 2 constructen
(predictor&criterion)
(Theoretical, based on
theory)

Construct validity = tussen
construct en measure (measure naar construct, of andersom).



Hoorcollege 2: Job analysis & performance

Job analysis = the process of studying and collecting information related to the activities and
responsibilities of a specific job. Defines the jobs/roles within the organization and the behaviors
required to perform these jobs. A study of what a jobholder does in the job, what must be known in
order to do it, what resources (facilitate goal achievement) are used in doing it and perhaps the
conditions (demands of the job) under which it is done. The starting point for all HRM activities:
recruitment & selection, training & development, performance appraisal, evaluation &
compensation. Now the tasks in a job are more diverse. Is it still relevant?

- Job analysis in the basic model of individual assessment: on the right (criterion measure and
construct). This is where you start is, you want to identify the indicators of the job.
- Performance indicators for an HR-manager at an international company: speaking the
language (successful communication with stakeholder), evaluations by employee that were
successfully helped by the manager, initiatives started up by the manager.
- Why would you do a job analysis?  optimize results, getting good results from good
candidates, recruit the right candidates, also more fair (fairness) (justice to select), this will
iterative employment, justify, save work & energy.

Organizational Need Analysis

- An important management task
- Method: conference/dialogue, root-cause-analysis (core issue), SWOT
(strengths/weaknesses/opportunities/threats), survey
- Outcomes: problem definition, actions and alternatives, costs and benefits, commitment,
practical opportunities.
- Organization-group-person (level of analysis)

, - This analysis links assessment to strategy goals of the organization
- If the organization need analysis shows that assessment can fix the problem, then to the next
step: job analysis criterion. Otherwise, it is not as necessary.

Approaches of job analysis

(1) Method
a) Inductive. You collect data and then make the idea of reality. Structured information
gathering. Analysis and interpretation of data. Data – outcome. Leads to very specific
information.
b) Deductive. Based on theories. Theory-based, best-fit model. Often standard survey linked
to model. Prior knowledge and theory about jobs and performance, what are generic
elements of ‘all’ jobs.
(2) Orientation
a) Task oriented. Duties & tasks of job. Job description/describe work. A classification
system of jobs is needed; how do jobs compare.
b) Worker oriented. Good performance indicators, behavior focus. Competency list. A
classification system of performance behaviors is needed; how is performance best
described?

1. Task inductive
Interview, ask what is your task
Hierarchical task analysis
2. Worker inductive
Repetory grid
3. Task deductive
Task characteristics approach,
translation of tasks into generic tasks,
comparison between jobs.
4. Worker deductive
Factor analysis of behavioral judgements/items. Cluster analysis

Inductive task-oriented example of hierarchical task analysis

Duty is responsibility, consists of different
tasks to be able to fulfil the duty.




Repertory grid = ask about high performers, low performance. Ask them to tell you HOW they are
different performance. Interview focused on difference in behavior. Divide the groups.

Critical incident = interview for examples of essential behaviors of high or low performance. Give an
example of a situation where it was essential to do x… What did the situation look like and what did
you do.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
6 september 2023
Aantal pagina's
25
Geschreven in
2022/2023
Type
College aantekeningen
Docent(en)
Yuri scharp
Bevat
Alle colleges

Onderwerpen

€5,89
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Thumbnail
Voordeelbundel
Personeelwetenschappen Jaar 2
-
4 6 2023
€ 33,74 Meer info

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
moniquemartens03 Universiteit Utrecht
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
103
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
44
Documenten
18
Laatst verkocht
1 maand geleden

4,3

6 beoordelingen

5
3
4
2
3
1
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen