Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary Task 2 - Filicides

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
1
Pagina's
22
Geüpload op
27-09-2023
Geschreven in
2023/2024

Summary of Task 2 in Forensic and Legal Psychology in a Nutshell

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

TASK 2: FILICIDE
WHAT IS FILICIDE?

 Filicide = homicides committed by a (foster-, step-) parent, with victim aged under 18
 Infanticide = killing of a child younger than 12 months
 Neonaticide = killing of infants in the first 24h of life
 Familicide – includes spouse & child victims: 1/3 of filicide-suicide cases
 Many samples are small  findings are sample specific – WHAT DO ALL THESE
STUDIES SHARE???


CLASSIFYING FILICIDE (PUTKONEN ET AL.)

 Filicide is a quite rare crime
 Global homicide rates of children aged 0-4: 5.3 per 100,000 children
 Global homicide rates of children aged 5-14 years: 2.05 per 100,000 children
 Many cases are never reported  true rate may be considerably higher
 Several classifications of filicide


Resnick’s 5-  Focused on motives: (1) altruistic, (2) acutely psychotic, (3) unwanted
category child, (4) accidental, (5) spousal revenge
classification  Remains influential today – “unwanted child” most commonly
reported motive for neonaticide

 Features that have to be taken into account to classify filicides: (1) family’s social
situation & domestic arrangements, (2) offender’s gender, (3) mental health status, (4)
criminal history, (5) substance-abuse history, (6) age of offender & victim, (7) method
of killing, (8) offender’s motives
 None of the classifications of filicide in the past have been universally accepted
 This study: create a classification scheme for filicide taking into consideration all
relevant features

METHODS

Data  Register-based, comprehensive nationwide data from Austria & Finland
collecting  Similar legal traditions & social systems
 All recorded filicide cases between 1995 & 2005
 Data on children were collected from coroner reports & death
certificates

Variables  Selection of variables based on other studies on filicide, homicide &
homicide-suicide
 Final variables: (1) offender’s history, (2) pre-offense circumstances, (3)
circumstances during the crime

, Data  124 offenders & 152 victims
description  63% mothers & 36% fathers
 15% of mothers & 38% of fathers committed suicide at the crime scene
 Fathers were sig. older (37.5) than mothers (31.6)
 34% of children were younger than 1 year

RESULTS

 5 classes of filicidal parents


Homicidal-  Most common motive: extended suicide, jealousy as underlying motive
Suicidal  2nd most likely to be married, at highest risk for separation
Fathers  Most likely to be employed, least educated
(14%)  The oldest group
 Intoxicated at the time of the crime more frequently than members of
another class
 Victims were 2nd least likely to be infants
 Previous incidents of domestic violence were 2nd most common
 Have a lot in common with homicide offenders who have killed intimate
partners & familicide offenders
 Method of killing: shooting more common than in any other class

Violent,  Motive: highest incidence of filicide as impulsive act (“accident”)
Impulsive  Less likely to have been working at the time of the crime
Parents  More likely to have exhibited features of conduct disorder during their
(11%) childhood
 2nd most infant victims
 Most likely to have had a criminal record before & to have been
responsible for earlier incidents of domestic violence
 Most similar with average homicide offender in Finnland
 Method of killing: battering was more common than in any other class

Single,  Motive: psychotic motives were 2nd most frequent, 3rd in terms of
Sober extended suicide
Parents  Least often intoxicated at time of the crime & least likely to have acted on
(28%) impulse
 Prior dealings with authorities on matters concerning their children
more often than any other class except Violent, Impulsive Parents
 69% of this group were mothers
 2nd oldest group
 No infant victims

Prosocial,  Motive: psychotic, 2nd in terms of extended suicide

, Psychotic  Most were not working at the time of the crime
Parents  Majority of people were married
(24%)  Most highly educated
 Almost no previous record of family violence & dealing with authorities
 73% of the group were mothers

Infanticidal  Motive: to get rid of unwanted child, no cases of psychotic / extended
Mothers suicide motivation
(23%)  The youngest + had the youngest victims
 Almost no previous dealings with authorities
 Methods of killing: suffocation was most common choice

DISCUSSION

 Some overlapping group characteristics
 Important general characteristics of filicide offenders like depression
 Among impulsive parents infants may be more likely to provoke (mis)perceptions of the
child’s behaviour & rage

STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS

 Data more comprehensive in many ways than those used in earlier studies
 Data from 2 countries  enhances generalisability of results BUT only within Europe
 Cultural issues could not be analysed
 Statistical analyses were limited  size of material quite small
 Retrospective study  no actual risk assessment / assessment of causality


THE WORLDWIDE INCIDENCE OF NEONATICIDE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TANAKA ET AL.)

METHODS

 Computerised systematic literature search for studies reporting the incidence of
neonaticide
 Only original population-based studies were selected  12 studies

RESULTS

 24 nationwide, regional, or local estimates of neonaticide incidence in 13 countries
 National rates – lowest in Finland & highest in Austria
 Subnational level – highest in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, lowest around Paris

DISCUSSION

 No reliable estimates of the dark number of neonaticides
 Legal definition of newborn murder varies from country to country significantly
 E.g., Finland has a very narrow definition – may account for the low figures

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
27 september 2023
Aantal pagina's
22
Geschreven in
2023/2024
Type
SAMENVATTING

Onderwerpen

€3,99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Thumbnail
Voordeelbundel
Forensic & Legal Psychology: Task 1-3
-
3 3 2023
€ 6,99 Meer info

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
emma2296 Maastricht University
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
31
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
3
Documenten
30
Laatst verkocht
8 maanden geleden

1,0

1 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
1

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen