Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
College aantekeningen

Lecture notes and book summary - Comparative Analysis of Political Systems - 2023 - Grade 8.5

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
1
Pagina's
44
Geüpload op
13-10-2023
Geschreven in
2023/2024

Notes on the lectures from the course (2023) Comparative Analysis of Political Systems (CAPS). Includes all lectures and readings

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Notes – Comparative Analysis of Political Systems 2023

Lecture 01: 06/09/2023
States, Nations, and Regimes


Comparative politics is the study and comparison of politics across countries.

- It is a research method, according to Lijphart.
- Right now, it is a combination of substance and method.

Why compare?

- To gather knowledge about other countries (and gaining knowledge about our country).
- To create classifications and develop typologies.
- To formulate and test hypotheses and theories.
- To make predictions.

Pitfalls of comparing

- Requires a lot of background information.
- Different meanings of concepts in different cultural and linguistic contexts.
- Ethnocentrism and stereotypes.
- Selection bias.

Stereotypes

- Over-generalised belief about a certain group of people; used as a mental shortcut.
- It can encourage prejudice and discrimination.

The state

- The main unit of political organisation in the world.
- Distinction:
- States are legal political organisations that maintain a monopoly of violence over a territory.
- Governments are the leadership or elite that administers a state (time-specific).
- Countries encompass the territory and people living within a state.
- Features of the state (Montevideo Convention 1933):
- Territory
- Population
- Sovereignty
- Internal sovereignty (monopoly of force).
- External sovereignty (capacity to enter relations with other states) – United Nations.

Anomalies to the state

- Supranational organisations (EU)
- Partially recognised states (Kosovo, Palestine, Taiwan)
- De facto states (Somaliland, TRNC) – no external sovereignty
- Failed states (Somalia, South Sudan) – no internal sovereignty
- Non-sovereign territories (Greenland, Puerto Rico) – still under the constitution of other countries

The Nation

- Imagined community (Anderson) that claims sovereignty over a specific territory.
- The nation is a social construct, an intersubjective fact.
- Nationalism
- Ideology, claiming the right of the nation to be sovereign (French Revolution, 1789).

, Notes – Comparative Analysis of Political Systems 2023

- Goals: Eradicate internal (ethnic) differences to homogenise the nation and differentiate the
nation from others.
- Nation-state: the notion that each nation has (or should have) its state and vice versa.
- Nationhood is not the same as citizenship.
- Citizenship is legal, but not everyone in the Netherlands is part of the Dutch nation.

Nationalism and Ethnicity

- Ethnicity is also mostly a social construct, drawing on common descent and heritage.
- Various ethnicities can exist within states and across states.
- Does not necessarily translate into a quest for political sovereignty.
- Ethnicity can overlap with the nation or conflict with it.
- Nationalism often has an ethnic foundation – old ethnic identities are resilient and have not disappeared.
- Political leaders can invoke both ethnicity and nationalism to generate mobilisation and legitimacy.
- Yugoslavia showed that nationhood can change and even disappear.

Did the state create the nation, or was the nation the state?

- Depends on the case.
- Depends also on the foundation of the nation:
- Ethnicity
- Language
- Religion
- Ideals/ ideology
- This determines the extent to which nations are open: can you become a nation member?
- Nation-building: transforming a state into a nation-state.

Regimes

- Democratic regime
- Term with a strong positive connotation.
- One of the most contested concepts in political science.
- ‘Rule by the people’ (demos + kratein) – Strong element of political equality.
- Direct vs. representative democracy.
- Representative: Enables democracy on a large scale; people elect representatives on their
behalf – a distinction between rulers (elite) and the ruled (mass).
- Majoritarian vs. liberal democracy.
- Majoritarian: the majority of the people decide.
- Liberal: as many people as possible decide – freedom, rule of law, and protection of
minorities are more important than majority preference. Idea of Trias Politica. However,
liberal dem. is less democratic as majority preference is not decisive.
- Authoritarian regime/ Dictatorship
- Term with a negative connotation.
- Highly diverse residual category (non-democracy).
- Defining characteristics: no competition for power and limited freedoms.
- Military junta, dictatorship, monarchy, one-party state, theocracy
- Hybrid/ Illiberal regime
- In-between cases (mostly emerged after the Third Wave of democratisation).
- Totalitarian regime
- Attempt to transform society on an ideological basis – socialisation of citizens.
- Participation is encouraged or enforced mass mobilisation.
- The state controls all aspects of public and private life through a system of terror.
- Single mass party, often led by a charismatic dictator.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
13 oktober 2023
Aantal pagina's
44
Geschreven in
2023/2024
Type
College aantekeningen
Docent(en)
Dr. w.p. veenendaal
Bevat
Alle colleges

Onderwerpen

€15,99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Thumbnail
Voordeelbundel
IRO - 3. Semester - 1. Block - All summaries
-
2 2 2023
€ 29,98 Meer info

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
teaksgardens-0r Universiteit Leiden
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
76
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
23
Documenten
22
Laatst verkocht
1 week geleden

4,4

16 beoordelingen

5
9
4
4
3
3
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen