Nursing 200 HONDROS Exam Final
Tanner Model of Clinical Judgement - Answer-Noticing
Interpreting
Responding
Reflecting
Nursing Process - Answer-Assessment
Diagnosis
Planning
Implementation
Evaluation
Identifying signs and symptoms - Answer-Indicates when a situation is normal, abnormal, or has
changed.
subjective and objective data
Gathering complete and accurate data - Answer-noticing Data from all reasonably available sources
, Assessing systematically and comprehensively - Answer-Noticing data by using a systematic method or
an assessment tool.
Predicting (and managing) potential complications - Answer-noticing when a situation has risk of
complications
Identifying assumptions - Answer-noticing the risk of arriving at conclusion without supporting evidence
Comparing and Contrasting - Answer-Discovering similarities and differences between situation
clustering related information - Answer-organizing data with a common theme (i.e. body system,
disease process, or event)
Recognizing inconsistencies - Answer-determining that the data appears to lead to opposing
conclusions, and more information is needed
checking accuracy and reliability - Answer-determining data needs to be confirmed before being acted
upon
Distinguishing relevant from irrelevant - Answer-separating information that is pertinent from
information that is not significant in planning care
determining the importance of information - Answer-determining the rank of importance of
information to prioritize care
Judging how much ambiguity is acceptable - Answer-determining if sound clinical judgment may allow
more than one interpretation
Tanner Model of Clinical Judgement - Answer-Noticing
Interpreting
Responding
Reflecting
Nursing Process - Answer-Assessment
Diagnosis
Planning
Implementation
Evaluation
Identifying signs and symptoms - Answer-Indicates when a situation is normal, abnormal, or has
changed.
subjective and objective data
Gathering complete and accurate data - Answer-noticing Data from all reasonably available sources
, Assessing systematically and comprehensively - Answer-Noticing data by using a systematic method or
an assessment tool.
Predicting (and managing) potential complications - Answer-noticing when a situation has risk of
complications
Identifying assumptions - Answer-noticing the risk of arriving at conclusion without supporting evidence
Comparing and Contrasting - Answer-Discovering similarities and differences between situation
clustering related information - Answer-organizing data with a common theme (i.e. body system,
disease process, or event)
Recognizing inconsistencies - Answer-determining that the data appears to lead to opposing
conclusions, and more information is needed
checking accuracy and reliability - Answer-determining data needs to be confirmed before being acted
upon
Distinguishing relevant from irrelevant - Answer-separating information that is pertinent from
information that is not significant in planning care
determining the importance of information - Answer-determining the rank of importance of
information to prioritize care
Judging how much ambiguity is acceptable - Answer-determining if sound clinical judgment may allow
more than one interpretation
