Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

CLA2601 Assignment 1 (ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
7
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
04-04-2025
Geschreven in
2024/2025

Well-structured CLA2601 Assignment 1 (ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED. (DETAILED ANSWERS - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!)..... Question 1 Zane, Bongi, Muthu and Sophy are friends who decide to form a partnership to purchase and sell new and secondhand mobile phones. Sophy and Bongi will provide the capital to purchase the initial stock for the partnership. Zane will be responsible for the repair of mobile phones and Muthu will be responsible for the day-to-day activities regarding the sales, administration and marketing of the mobile phone business. The parties agree that the profit derived from the partnership will be divided equally between Bongi, Sophy and Zane, and that Muthu will receive a monthly salary for his services. Discuss and explain whether the above terms constitute a valid partnership agreement. Refer to relevant case law in your answer. 10 marks Question 2 Explain the formalities and requirements that partners who wish to enter into a partnership agreement must adhere to in order to conclude a valid partnership agreement. Refer to relevant case law where applicable.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

CLA2601
Assignment 1 Semester 1 2025
Unique Number: 770912
Due Date: 7 April 2025
QUESTION 1 (2 ANSWERS PROVIDED)



For a valid partnership to exist in South African law, certain essentialia must be present:

(a) at least two persons agree to act in common;
(b) each contributes something—whether money, skill, or labour;
(c) the enterprise is carried on for their joint benefit; (d) the object is the making of
profit; and
(d) the intention is that each partner shares in the net profit and bears a corresponding
share in any loss.
In Joubert v Tarry & Co 1915 TPD 277, the court stressed that sharing in the profits (and
losses) of the business is central to the notion of partnership




DISCLAIMER & TERMS OF USE
 Educational Aid: These study notes are intended to be used as educational resources and should not be seen as a
replacement for individual research, critical analysis, or professional consultation. Students are encouraged to perform
their own research and seek advice from their instructors or academic advisors for specific assignment guidelines.
 Personal Responsibility: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information in
these study notes, the seller does not guarantee the completeness or correctness of all content. The buyer is
responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information and exercising their own judgment when applying it to their
assignments.
 Academic Integrity: It is essential for students to maintain academic integrity and follow their institution's policies
regarding plagiarism, citation, and referencing. These study notes should be used as learning tools and sources of
inspiration. Any direct reproduction of the content without proper citation and acknowledgment may be considered
academic misconduct.
 Limited Liability: The seller shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages, losses, or consequences arising from
the use of these notes. This includes, but is not limited to, poor academic performance, penalties, or any other negative
consequences resulting from the application or misuse of the information provided.

, For additional support +27 81 278 3372

QUESTION 1 (2 ANSWERS PROVIDED)

For a valid partnership to exist in South African law, certain essentialia must be
present:

(a) at least two persons agree to act in common;
(b) each contributes something—whether money, skill, or labour;
(c) the enterprise is carried on for their joint benefit; (d) the object is the making
of profit; and
(d) the intention is that each partner shares in the net profit and bears a
corresponding share in any loss.
In Joubert v Tarry & Co 1915 TPD 277, the court stressed that sharing in the profits
(and losses) of the business is central to the notion of partnership.

In the present scenario, Zane, Bongi, Muthu, and Sophy intend to form a partnership
to buy and sell mobile phones. Bongi and Sophy contribute capital, Zane contributes
repair services, and Muthu is responsible for administration, marketing, and day-to-
day sales. Although they do carry on a business aimed at making profit for their
common enterprise, a potential problem arises regarding Muthu’s status. The
agreement explicitly states that profits are to be divided only among Bongi, Sophy,
and Zane, whereas Muthu receives a monthly salary rather than a share of net
profits.

This arrangement suggests that Muthu may not be a partner at all, but rather an
employee. In Joubert v Tarry & Co, the court indicated that a partner must at least
participate in the business’s net profit; the fact that Muthu does not share in those
profits is inconsistent with partnership. While Muthu’s services constitute a
contribution, the absence of profit participation undermines the joint-benefit
requirement.

Therefore, under the general principles set out in Joubert v Tarry & Co, only Bongi,
Sophy, and Zane effectively meet the requirements of partnership. Muthu’s fixed
remuneration places him outside the circle of co-partners, making the partnership
valid only among the other three.



OR

Gekoppeld boek

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
4 april 2025
Aantal pagina's
7
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

€4,08
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
Edge
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
10686
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
4256
Documenten
3130
Laatst verkocht
1 uur geleden

4,2

1328 beoordelingen

5
749
4
268
3
198
2
34
1
79

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen