Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

NURS 507 Exam I Study Guide Questions Answered Correctly Rated A+

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
7
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
14-06-2025
Geschreven in
2024/2025

NURS 507 Exam I Study Guide Questions Answered Correctly Rated A+ Cognitive Error - Answers A mistake in reasoning, perception, memory, or judgment that can lead to diagnostic inaccuracies. Anchoring bias - Answers The tendency to lock into initial salient features in a patient's presentation, potentially leading to diagnostic errors by failing to consider later information. Availability heuristic - Answers The assumption that a diagnosis is more likely if it readily comes to mind, potentially leading to overlooking less obvious but more accurate diagnoses. Confirmation bias - Answers The tendency to seek evidence that supports a diagnosis while ignoring contradictory information, potentially leading to misdiagnosis. Diagnostic momentum - Answers The inclination to prioritize a diagnosis made by previous clinicians, potentially leading to overlooking alternative explanations. Framing effect - Answers The influence of how information about a problem is presented, potentially leading to biased interpretations and decisions. Representation error - Answers The failure to consider prevalence when estimating the probability of a diagnosis, potentially leading to inaccurate assessments. Visceral bias - Answers The influence of positive or negative feelings toward patients on diagnostic decisions, potentially leading to biased judgments. Primary prevention - Answers Strategies aimed at preventing disease through immunizations, medical procedures, and behavioral counseling. Secondary prevention - Answers Interventions and screening tests designed to detect diseases or processes in their early stages. Levels of evidence BEST - Answers Systematic reviews Worst Level of vidence - Answers expert opinion SnNOUT - Answers A sensitive test with a negative result that can effectively rule out disease. SpPIN - Answers A specific test with a positive result that can effectively rule in disease. Kappa Score - Answers A measure of agreement beyond chance in diagnostic testing. Likelihood ratio interpretation - Answers The probability of obtaining a given test result in a diseased patient divided by the probability of obtaining the same result in a non-diseased patient. Nonmaleficence - Answers do no harm Beneficence - Answers Doing good or causing good to be done; kindly action Respect autonomy - Answers One of the core ethical principles : means to promote one's independence or self-sufficiency. decisional capacity - Answers the ability to make right choices for oneself as they relate to medical care informed consent - Answers an ethical principle that research participants be told enough to enable them to choose whether they wish to participate

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
NURS 507
Vak
NURS 507

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

NURS 507 Exam I Study Guide Questions Answered Correctly Rated A+

Cognitive Error - Answers A mistake in reasoning, perception, memory, or judgment that can lead to
diagnostic inaccuracies.

Anchoring bias - Answers The tendency to lock into initial salient features in a patient's presentation,
potentially leading to diagnostic errors by failing to consider later information.

Availability heuristic - Answers The assumption that a diagnosis is more likely if it readily comes to mind,
potentially leading to overlooking less obvious but more accurate diagnoses.

Confirmation bias - Answers The tendency to seek evidence that supports a diagnosis while ignoring
contradictory information, potentially leading to misdiagnosis.

Diagnostic momentum - Answers The inclination to prioritize a diagnosis made by previous clinicians,
potentially leading to overlooking alternative explanations.

Framing effect - Answers The influence of how information about a problem is presented, potentially
leading to biased interpretations and decisions.

Representation error - Answers The failure to consider prevalence when estimating the probability of a
diagnosis, potentially leading to inaccurate assessments.

Visceral bias - Answers The influence of positive or negative feelings toward patients on diagnostic
decisions, potentially leading to biased judgments.

Primary prevention - Answers Strategies aimed at preventing disease through immunizations, medical
procedures, and behavioral counseling.

Secondary prevention - Answers Interventions and screening tests designed to detect diseases or
processes in their early stages.

Levels of evidence BEST - Answers Systematic reviews

Worst Level of vidence - Answers expert opinion

SnNOUT - Answers A sensitive test with a negative result that can effectively rule out disease.

SpPIN - Answers A specific test with a positive result that can effectively rule in disease.

Kappa Score - Answers A measure of agreement beyond chance in diagnostic testing.

Likelihood ratio interpretation - Answers The probability of obtaining a given test result in a diseased
patient divided by the probability of obtaining the same result in a non-diseased patient.

Nonmaleficence - Answers do no harm

Beneficence - Answers Doing good or causing good to be done; kindly action

, Respect autonomy - Answers One of the core ethical principles : means to promote one's independence
or self-sufficiency.

decisional capacity - Answers the ability to make right choices for oneself as they relate to medical care

informed consent - Answers an ethical principle that research participants be told enough to enable
them to choose whether they wish to participate

truth telling - Answers involves providing enough information so that a patient can make an informed
decision about his or her health care.

Justice - Answers Respecting the rights of others and giving them what is rightfully theirs

Relative Risk - Answers The probability of an outcome in the intervention group compared to the
probability of the same outcome in the control group.

Relative risk difference - Answers Describes the proportion of baseline risk reduced or increased with
therapy.

Absolute risk difference - Answers The difference in outcome rates between comparison groups.

selection bias - Answers when comparison groups have systemic differences in their baseline
characteristics

performance bias - Answers Bias that occurs due to systematic differences in care between treatment
groups or in exposure to factors other than the intervention being studied.

detection bias - Answers systematic differences between groups in how outcomes are determined

Attrition bias - Answers refers to the systematic loss or withdrawal of participants from follow-up

Physical exam courtesy - Answers Ensuring patient privacy, comfort, clear instructions, and respectful
positioning and draping during physical examinations.

Subjective data - Answers things a person tells you about that you cannot observe through your senses;
symptoms

objective data - Answers information that is seen, heard, felt, or smelled by an observer; signs

OPQRST - Answers A mnemonic for assessing patient symptoms: Onset, Provocation/Palliation, Quality,
Region/Radiation, Severity, and Timing.

Cage questionnaire score - Answers two or more affirmative answers

CAGE questionnaire - Answers A tool for assessing alcohol abuse: Cutting down, Annoyance when
criticized, Guilty feelings, Eye openers.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
NURS 507
Vak
NURS 507

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
14 juni 2025
Aantal pagina's
7
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

€9,63
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
TutorJosh Chamberlain College Of Nursing
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
441
Lid sinds
1 jaar
Aantal volgers
16
Documenten
31748
Laatst verkocht
2 dagen geleden
Tutor Joshua

Here You will find all Documents and Package Deals Offered By Tutor Joshua.

3,5

73 beoordelingen

5
26
4
16
3
14
2
1
1
16

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen