CRW2602 Criminal Law: Specific Crimes
University of South Africa
Hier vind je de beste samenvattingen om te slagen voor CRW2602 Criminal Law: Specific Crimes. Er zijn o.a. samenvattingen, aantekeningen en oefenvragen beschikbaar.
Alle 18 resultaten
Sorteer op:
-
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
CRW2602 EXAM PREP ( Questions With Answers 2018-2022)
-
---234april 20222021/2022A+
- CRW2602 EXAM PREP 
( Questions With Answers 
2018-2022) Name the three general speed limits and the roads to which they apply in terms of section 
59(1) of the National Road Traffic Act 93 of 1996. (6) 
The three general speed limits and the roads to which they apply in terms of section 59(1) of the National 
Road Traffic Act 93 of 1996 are: 
60km – A public road within an urban area. 
100km – A public road outside an urban area. 
120km – a freeway. 
(b) Read the following scenario and ans...
-
$4.99 Meer Info
ExcelAcademia2026
-
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
CRW2602 EXAM PACK 2020
-
---97april 20222021/2022A+
- CRW2602 
EXAM PACK 2020 
MCQ Pack 2020 for CRW2602 
assignment 2020 
QUESTION 1 
(a) In the crime of crimen iniuria the infringement need not be serious as a 
minor infringement of the legally-protected interests is deemed sufficient. 
 This statement is incorrect. The infringement must be serious in the case of 
the crime of crimen iniuria. See SG 7.2.8. 
(b) In S v Van Leperen 2017 (1) SACR 226 (WCC), X was convicted of crimen 
iniuria for slapping Y, a female manager, on the buttocks and maki...
-
$4.29 Meer Info
lectdenis
-
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
CRW2602 With side notes - MCQ Sheet with Answers.
-
---116april 20222021/2022A+
- Multiple chioce 
Question 1 
(a) If X hires Z to murder Y and Z murders Y, Z is the indirect perpetrator. 
(b) If X buys dagga for his own use and Y acts merely as interpreter to the transaction, Y can 
qualify as an accomplice. 
(c) In Thebus 2003 (2) SACR 319 (CC) it was held that the only way in which a common 
purpose can be established is if there is proof of a prior agreement between two or more 
participants. 
(1) Only statement (a) is correct. 
(2) Only statement (b) is correct. 
(3) Onl...
-
$3.99 Meer Info
LOVELY01
-
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
CRW2602 Assignment 1 Semester 1 & 2 2021
-
---4april 20222021/2022A+
- CRW2602 Assignment 1 Semester 1 
& 2 2021 
PREVIEW OF QUESTION 1 
Discuss whether X will be liable for the crime of terrorism 
X performed an act which qualifies as a “terrorist activity” interms of s 1 of the Protection of Constitutional 
Democracy against Terrorist and Related Activities Act 33 of2004.
-
$3.99 Meer Info
LOVELY01
-
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
CRW2602 - Criminal Law: Specific Crimes-mcq-pack-2020.
-
---98maart 20222021/2022A+
- CRW2602 - Criminal Law: Specific Crimes-mcq-pack-2020. 
assignment 2020 
QUESTION 1 
(a) In the crime of crimen iniuria the infringement need not be serious as a 
minor infringement of the legally-protected interests is deemed sufficient. 
 This statement is incorrect. The infringement must be serious in the case of 
the crime of crimen iniuria. See SG 7.2.8. 
(b) In S v Van Leperen 2017 (1) SACR 226 (WCC), X was convicted of crimen 
iniuria for slapping Y, a female manager, on the buttocks and ...
-
$4.19 Meer Info
DoctorReinhad
-
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
CRW2602 CRIMINAL LAW EXAM PACK.
-
---70maart 20222021/2022A+
- CRW2602 
CRIMINAL LAW 
EXAM PACK.Question 1 
(a) This statement is correct. See SG 1.2.2 (vi). 
(b) This statement is incorrect. See SG 1.2.7. Dolus eventualis is a sufficient 
form of intention. 
(c) This statement is correct. See SG 1.2.6. 
 
You should, therefore, have chosen option (4) since only statements (a) and (c) are 
correct. 
 
Question 2 
(a) This statement is correct. See SG 1.3.4. 
(b) This statement is correct. See SG 1.3.4. 
(c) This statement is correct. See SG 1.3.4. 
 
You sh...
-
$4.09 Meer Info
DoctorReinhad
-
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
CRW2602 MCQ EXAM PACK 2021/2022
-
---97maart 20222021/2022A+
- CRW2602 
MCQ EXAM 
PACK 
2021/2022. CRW2602 - Criminal Law: Specific Crimes 
QUESTION 1 
(a) In the crime of crimen iniuria the infringement need not be serious as a 
minor infringement of the legally-protected interests is deemed sufficient. 
 This statement is incorrect. The infringement must be serious in the case of 
the crime of crimen iniuria. See SG 7.2.8. 
(b) In S v Van Leperen 2017 (1) SACR 226 (WCC), X was convicted of crimen 
iniuria for slapping Y, a female manager, on the buttocks ...
-
$4.99 Meer Info
ExcelAcademia2026