PHIL29906 MIDTERM1 MindMap
I CoreThemes
1 MindandMatter
bodymaterial
immaterial
ind
Iron
2 Thinkingandcomputing
thinking the
TuringRedefines via Test
G ameTuring
Imitation
roles
states causal
PutnamFunctionalismmental
SearleChinese
Roomsyntaxsemantics
through
gamesmeaning
Wittgenstein Language usenot
mechanism
I KeyThinkers Concepts
untthemindwith
for thesciences
from
taken
material
inwnI.t
iiiiiiiiiiiitiiii.fi iiimama
Effque
Ifmindhasno canitcause
extensionhow movement
a mechanism
Demands causal
not assertion
metaphysical
Evaluation
strong exposing
a rgument in
incoherence Cartesian
for
debates
interactionismfoundational embodiment
T
Rejectscan think
machines
asmeaningless
Test if
Turing
Proposes
is fromhuman'sthat's
behaviorindistinguishable a enough
of
definition intelligence
Functional Behavioral
EvaluationBrilliant for but asa of
move science insufficient definition understanding
operational or consciousness
ii.it i ii i iii int
EvaluationPersuasive
asamodelofcognitionbut forignoring
criticized and
consciousness m eaning
Ehinese understanding semantics
Room
A rgument symbolssyntax
Manipulating
Refutes
strong AIthe that
idea c omputationmind
Evaluation Powerful
of too
critique computationalismbut restrictive onlybiologicalsystems
assumes have
can i ntentionality
Witt
farn's
imaginingapeculiar
against mechanism
the of
mind
h uman
Understanding abilitytoparticipateinlanguage
games
shared practices
Meaning usenot
internal
process
Evaluation
I nsightful against
warning the but
reifying mind may internal
underestimate
processes for participation
needed linguistic
I CoreThemes
1 MindandMatter
bodymaterial
immaterial
ind
Iron
2 Thinkingandcomputing
thinking the
TuringRedefines via Test
G ameTuring
Imitation
roles
states causal
PutnamFunctionalismmental
SearleChinese
Roomsyntaxsemantics
through
gamesmeaning
Wittgenstein Language usenot
mechanism
I KeyThinkers Concepts
untthemindwith
for thesciences
from
taken
material
inwnI.t
iiiiiiiiiiiitiiii.fi iiimama
Effque
Ifmindhasno canitcause
extensionhow movement
a mechanism
Demands causal
not assertion
metaphysical
Evaluation
strong exposing
a rgument in
incoherence Cartesian
for
debates
interactionismfoundational embodiment
T
Rejectscan think
machines
asmeaningless
Test if
Turing
Proposes
is fromhuman'sthat's
behaviorindistinguishable a enough
of
definition intelligence
Functional Behavioral
EvaluationBrilliant for but asa of
move science insufficient definition understanding
operational or consciousness
ii.it i ii i iii int
EvaluationPersuasive
asamodelofcognitionbut forignoring
criticized and
consciousness m eaning
Ehinese understanding semantics
Room
A rgument symbolssyntax
Manipulating
Refutes
strong AIthe that
idea c omputationmind
Evaluation Powerful
of too
critique computationalismbut restrictive onlybiologicalsystems
assumes have
can i ntentionality
Witt
farn's
imaginingapeculiar
against mechanism
the of
mind
h uman
Understanding abilitytoparticipateinlanguage
games
shared practices
Meaning usenot
internal
process
Evaluation
I nsightful against
warning the but
reifying mind may internal
underestimate
processes for participation
needed linguistic
