Periode 1 2024
perspectief op
criminaliteit
Literatuursamenvatting
Voorderhake, E. (Eline)
RADBOUD UNIVERSITEIT
,Inhoudsopgave
1) GLOBALISATIE..................................................................................................................... 4
2) WAT IS CRIMINOLOGIE?........................................................................................................ 5
3) WAT IS VICTIMOLOGIE?......................................................................................................... 5
4) CRIMINOLOGIE EN PUBLIEK BELEID.......................................................................................... 6
1) WETTELIJKE DEFINITIE.......................................................................................................... 6
2) CONSENSUS EN CONFLICT BENADERINGEN................................................................................6
3) HAGANS PYRAMIDE VAN CRIMINALITEIT.....................................................................................8
4) CRIMINALITEITSPRISMA......................................................................................................... 9
5) CRIMINALITEIT VAN DE MACHTELOZEN......................................................................................9
6) CRIMINALITEIT VAN DE MACHTIGEN........................................................................................10
H3 – KLASSIEKE, NEOKLASSIEKE EN RATIONELE-KEUZE THEORIEËN....................10
1) HET PREKLASSIEKE TIJDPERK................................................................................................10
2) THE KLASSIEKE REACTIE..................................................................................................... 11
3) NEOKLASSIEKE REVISIE....................................................................................................... 13
4) CRIMINELE GERECHTIGHEID IMPLICATIES: DE BEWEGING NAAR GERECHTIGHEIDSTHEORIE..................13
5) HET HERDEFINIËREN VAN RATIONELE KEUZE: SITUATIONELE FACTOREN EN ROUTINE-ACTIVITEITEN
THEORIE.............................................................................................................................. 14
6) CONCEPTUELE EN EMPIRISCHE BEPERKINGEN: WAT HET ONDERZOEK LAAT ZIEN..............................15
1) BIOLOGISCHE EN POSITIVISTISCHE ASSUMPTIES........................................................................16
2) DE GEBOREN CRIMINEEL..................................................................................................... 16
3) VROEGE AMERIKAANSE FAMILIETYPE EN LICHAAMSTYPE THEORIEEN ̈ ..............................................17
4) HUIDIGE BIOLOGISCHE PERSPECTIEVEN..................................................................................18
5) CONCEPTUELE EN EMPIRISCHE BEPERKINGEN...........................................................................19
6) STRAFRECHTELIJKE BELEIDSIMPLICATIES..................................................................................20
H6 – HET LEREN VAN CRIMINEEL GEDRAG: SOCIALE PROCESTHEORIEËN.............20
1) ALGEMENE THEMA’S EN VERSCHILLENDE ASSUMPTIES...............................................................20
2) SUTHERLANDS DIFFERENTIËLE ASSOCIATIETHEORIE...................................................................21
3) COGNITIEVE SOCIALE LEERTHEORIE.......................................................................................22
4) NEUTRALISATIETHEORIE: RATIONALISATIES LEREN ALS MOTIVATIES................................................23
1) CONTROLETHEORIE: HET LEREN VAN NIET CRIMINEEL ZIJN..........................................................24
1) DE HISTORISCHE WORTELS VAN SOCIALE ECOLOGIETHEORIE.......................................................29
2) ALGEMENE THEMA’S EN ASSUMPTIES.....................................................................................30
3) DE CHICAGO SCHOOL........................................................................................................ 30
4) CULTURELE THEORIEEN̈ OVER CRIMINALITEIT............................................................................32
5) KRITISCHE GANGSTUDIES.................................................................................................... 32
1) ALGEMENE THEMA’S EN ASSUMPTIES.....................................................................................33
2) OPRICHTERS VAN ANOMIE EN DRUKTHEORIE............................................................................34
1) ALGEMENE THEMA’S, ASSUMPTIES EN BELANGRIJKE VERSCHILLEN................................................37
2) DE WORTELS VAN CONFLICTCRIMINOLOGIE..............................................................................38
3) MODERNE CONFLICTCRIMINOLOGIE........................................................................................38
4) DE WORTELS VAN RADICALE THEORIE: MARX’S ANALYSE VAN DE KAPITALISTISCHE SAMENLEVING........39
5) MODERNE RADICALE CRIMINOLOGIE.......................................................................................41
6) ALGEMENE THEMA’S EN ASSUMPTIES.....................................................................................41
H12 – NIEUWE BEWEGINGEN BINNEN KRITISCHE CRIMINOLOGISCHE THEORIE
(BEHALVE 301-312)..........................................................................................43
CRITICAL CRIMINOLOGIES........................................................................................................ 43
LEFT REALISM....................................................................................................................... 44
CULTURAL CRIMINOLOGY......................................................................................................... 45
ANARCHISM, ABOLITIONISM, PEACEMAKING AND RESTORATIVE JUSTICE.............................................46
CRITICAL RACE THEORY.......................................................................................................... 48
EVALUATION OF NEW DIRECTIONS IN CRITICAL CRIMINOLOGY...........................................................49
Left realism................................................................................................................... 49
Anarchism and abolitionism.......................................................................................... 49
Peacemaking................................................................................................................ 50
1
, Restorative justice........................................................................................................ 50
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION.................................................................................................... 50
Left realism................................................................................................................... 50
Abolitionist/ Peacemaking/ Restorative Justice.............................................................51
HC 2 – MEIJER ET AL. (2022). ‘CRIMINALITEIT EN RECHTSHANDHAVING 2021’......54
H2 HET NEDERLANDSE STRAFRECHTSYSTEEM.............................................................................54
Centrale begrippen en personen in de strafrechtspleging............................................54
Opsporing en bestuurlijke handhaving.........................................................................55
De vervolging............................................................................................................... 56
De berechting............................................................................................................... 57
HC 3 – KENNISCLIPS.........................................................................................58
BECCARIA ON CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS..................................................................................58
JEREMY BENTHAM UTILITARIANISM............................................................................................58
IMPLICATIONS OF CHOICE THEORY ON SOCIAL POLICY & CRIME......................................................59
DETERRENCE THEORY IN CRIMINOLOGY......................................................................................59
HC 3 – WERMINK ET AL. (2017) ‘RECIDIVE NA EEN KORTE OF LANGERE PERIODE IN
DETENTIE’....................................................................................................... 60
INLEIDING............................................................................................................................ 60
RESULTATEN......................................................................................................................... 60
HC 4 – DE CUYPER ET AL. (2009) ‘DE CO-EVOLUTIE VAN VRIENDSCHAPSRELATIES
EN DELINQUENT GEDRAG ONDER NEDERLANDSE JONGEREN’..............................61
INLEIDING EN PROBLEEMSTELLING............................................................................................. 61
Eerdere beperkingen.................................................................................................... 61
THEORIEËN EN HYPOTHESEN.................................................................................................... 61
RESULTATEN......................................................................................................................... 62
Model 1 zonder controlevariabelen...............................................................................62
Model 2 met controlevariabelen...................................................................................62
Model 3 met interactieterm.......................................................................................... 63
CONCLUSIE EN DISCUSSIE........................................................................................................ 63
Beperkingen................................................................................................................. 63
HC 5 – RAMAKERS ET AL. (2017) ‘NOT JUST ANY JOB WILL DO: A STUDY ON
EMPLOYMENT CHARACTERISTICS AND RECIDIVISM RISKS AFTER RELEASE..........64
INLEIDING............................................................................................................................ 64
DISCUSSIE........................................................................................................................... 64
GASTCOLLEGE 1 – JENNIFER ET AL. (2020) ‘DESISTANCE FROM CRIME DURING THE
TRANSITION TO ADULTHOOD: THE INFLUENCE OF PARENTS, PEERS, AND SHIFTS IN
IDENTITY......................................................................................................... 66
Inleiding........................................................................................................................ 66
Data en methode.......................................................................................................... 67
Resultaten.................................................................................................................... 67
Discussie...................................................................................................................... 68
GASTCOLLEGE 2 – BISSCHOP (2021) ‘DADERSCHAP IN HET ANTROPOGEEN’........70
INLEIDING............................................................................................................................ 70
DE AMBIGUÏTEIT VAN CRIMINALITEIT........................................................................................... 70
DADERSCHAP EN BETROKKENHEID VAN HET POLITIEK-ECONOMISCHE SYSTEEM....................................70
DADERSCHAP EN BETROKKENHEID VAN ORGANISATIES...................................................................71
INDIVIDUEEL DADERSCHAP....................................................................................................... 71
Individueel daderschap................................................................................................. 72
CONCLUDERENDE BESCHOUWING OVER CRIMINOLOGIE IN HET ANTROPOCEEN.....................................74
GASTCOLLEGE 3 - VAN DE WEIJER, S. (2022). INTERGENERATIONAL CONTINUITY OF
CRIME: A COMPARISON BETWEEN CHILDREN OF DISCORDANT SIBLINGS.............76
INLEIDING............................................................................................................................ 76
2
, METHODE............................................................................................................................ 76
RESULTATEN......................................................................................................................... 78
DISCUSSIE........................................................................................................................... 78
CONCLUSIES......................................................................................................................... 78
OEFENTENTAMENVRAGEN................................................................................79
WB 1................................................................................................................................. 79
WB 2................................................................................................................................. 79
WB 3................................................................................................................................. 80
WB 4................................................................................................................................. 81
WB 5................................................................................................................................. 82
3